User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: The U.S. Air Force Fears for Its F-15s and F-35s vs. Russia's S-400. But . . .

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,022, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497369
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,693
    Points
    863,022
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,627
    Thanked 148,379x in 94,871 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    The U.S. Air Force Fears for Its F-15s and F-35s vs. Russia's S-400. But . . .

    The U.S. Air Force Fears for Its F-15s and F-35s vs. Russia's S-400. But . . .

    The butt is- the S-400 isn't all that it is cracked up to be.

    The United States and other nations worry that Russia’s sophisticated anti-aircraft missiles will deny the skies to Western aircraft.
    Too bad some Russians aren’t so confident.


    A Russian military expert warns that air defense missile systems, like the vaunted S-300 and S-400, aren’t all they’re cracked up to be.

    The problem is that NATO can overwhelm Russia’s air defenses, argues Anatolyevich Khramchikhin, deputy director of the Institute for Political and Military Analysis.

    One problem is that the United States can saturate Russian defenses with volleys of cruise missiles such as the Tomahawk and the Joint Air-to-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM). Moreover, surface-to-air missile (SAM) batteries in Russia’s Kaliningrad enclave on the Baltic can be destroyed by U.S. High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) multiple rocket launchers.


    Another problem is logistical: Russian air defenses can’t fire and reload missiles quickly enough to stop a NATO air and missile offensive. “The fact that it is possible to knock down no more than one target of a single SAM, apparently, does not need to be explained to anyone,” says Khramchikhin. “This is basic arithmetic. The combat algorithms for the S-300P and S-400 imply the use of two missiles for the same target in automatic combat mode; you can only switch to the option ‘one missile - one target’ manually. That is, if the regiment has 64 ready-to-launch missiles, then it can knock down a maximum of 64 targets, or actually 32. After which the regiment is ‘reset.’ The standard for reloading one launcher for an ‘excellent’ [inspection] rating is 53 minutes. That is, it will take at least an hour to restore the regiment’s combat readiness, which is a bit much in the context of a modern war.”
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MMC (05-13-2019)

  3. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well we know the S 300 isn't for sure. The Israelis flew all over Iran and the mopes didn't even know they were there.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-13-2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts