Last edited by Sergeant Gleed; 05-14-2019 at 02:24 PM.
Freedom Requires Obstinance.
We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.
Captdon (05-14-2019)
DGUtley (05-15-2019)
My religion goes by when the first breath occurs, which makes a lot of sense medically/biologically. Respiratory depression, arrest or prolonged apnea ultimately stops life or can lead to brain death. The heart, while neat, requires respiration. The body requires oxygen and CO2. It's really more essential than the actual organs. Nothing on earth would really be living without the process or a similar process. This seems like a much cleaner way of determining life, and I think the Jewish people were onto something when they/we came up with that gem.
It is an interesting perspective, at any rate. Might be interesting to hear arguments about what the law or legal "rights" should be if a child is considered part of the mother until the first breath. If a mother is basically acting as nature's life support, which she is, does that impact her options or rights?
Dr. Who (05-17-2019),IMPress Polly (05-15-2019)
Isn't that ensoulment? The Greeks believed it happened at 40 days after conception (Aristotle) and the early Catholic Church followed that, though now I think it happens at conception.*
My argument is purely biological, at least as far as when the life of a unique living being begins.
*https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...025-4/fulltext
*https://www.irishtimes.com/news/soci...1869-1.1449517
Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler
Captdon (05-14-2019)
No, I argue for allowing others make their own choices. It's a stretch, IMO, to call abortion murder until such time as a the fetus is able to tell you how $#@!ing sick and tired this $#@!ing issue has grown. Yet one can't get out of the swamp because both sides want to impose their own sins on everyone else as a matter of accepted morality and behavior when neither are right. It isn't going to stop, so you can probably kiss your soul goodbye because at some point you're going to have to impose one or the other will on everyone else.
My position is that it's none of my business, it's hers -- or rather, it's hers and her mates. But hey, we won't bring dad into this, eh?
Last edited by Lummy; 05-14-2019 at 08:37 PM.
It is murder and you support it. You can come up with argument but the fact is that you support legalized murder.It is a biological fact. The baby doesn't have the same DNA as the mother, Everything else about her does, including cancer.
Morals are not changed to fit convenience. Your post is cartoon =like.
Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
Pick your enemies carefully.
I'm really not understanding what your complaint is, other than, "how dare anyone try and impede our right to rip live children from the womb and slaughter them".
Soooo, do you think there should be any restrictions whatsoever on abortion? Full term? Make the baby comfortable, and have a conversation? What?
Cutesy Time is OVER
Captdon (05-15-2019)