User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Pentagon contractor's 9,400% profit on a half-inch metal pin is challenged

  1. #1
    Points: 85,040, Level: 71
    Level completed: 8%, Points required for next Level: 2,210
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    27586
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    11,128
    Points
    85,040
    Level
    71
    Thanks Given
    14,094
    Thanked 9,555x in 5,668 Posts
    Mentioned
    87 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Pentagon contractor's 9,400% profit on a half-inch metal pin is challenged

    See more at the link https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...cid=spartanntp

    Excerpt:

    The Pentagon is weighing legislation that would give contracting officers the power to demand back-up data on spare parts costs after its inspector general said TransDigm Group Inc. could be paid about 9,400% in excess profit for a half-inch metal pin.

    The Defense Logistics Agency could end up paying TransDigm $4,361 for the “drive pin” in a July contract that should cost $46, according to a Pentagon review endorsed by the inspector general.

    The review found potential excess profits for 98 of 100 parts sampled and concluded the Pentagon may end up paying TransDigm $91 million more in coming years for parts valued at $28 million, with excess profit per part of 95% to the 9,380%, the Defense Department’s inspector general said in an audit labeled “For Official Use Only” and obtained by Bloomberg News.

    As the Pentagon weighs whether to recommend legislation to require more disclosure by contractors, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform will review the audit and TransDigm’s pricing policies in a hearing on Wednesday.
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Just AnotherPerson For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-15-2019)

  3. #2
    Points: 173,663, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,987
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88672
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,085
    Points
    173,663
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,449
    Thanked 20,640x in 14,854 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Just AnotherPerson View Post
    See more at the link https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...cid=spartanntp

    Excerpt:

    The Pentagon is weighing legislation that would give contracting officers the power to demand back-up data on spare parts costs after its inspector general said TransDigm Group Inc. could be paid about 9,400% in excess profit for a half-inch metal pin.

    The Defense Logistics Agency could end up paying TransDigm $4,361 for the “drive pin” in a July contract that should cost $46, according to a Pentagon review endorsed by the inspector general.

    The review found potential excess profits for 98 of 100 parts sampled and concluded the Pentagon may end up paying TransDigm $91 million more in coming years for parts valued at $28 million, with excess profit per part of 95% to the 9,380%, the Defense Department’s inspector general said in an audit labeled “For Official Use Only” and obtained by Bloomberg News.

    As the Pentagon weighs whether to recommend legislation to require more disclosure by contractors, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform will review the audit and TransDigm’s pricing policies in a hearing on Wednesday.
    This was all explained in the movie Men in Black. Only instead of dealing with aliens they spend the money out of sight , in back rooms and $#@! holes without our knowledge.
    For example how could the "Contracting officers" not already have the power to question cost and pricing?

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to donttread For This Useful Post:

    Just AnotherPerson (05-15-2019)

  5. #3
    Points: 265,586, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 57.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308005
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,807
    Points
    265,586
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,879
    Thanked 39,379x in 27,945 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Just AnotherPerson View Post
    See more at the link https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/comp...cid=spartanntp

    Excerpt:

    The Pentagon is weighing legislation that would give contracting officers the power to demand back-up data on spare parts costs after its inspector general said TransDigm Group Inc. could be paid about 9,400% in excess profit for a half-inch metal pin.

    The Defense Logistics Agency could end up paying TransDigm $4,361 for the “drive pin” in a July contract that should cost $46, according to a Pentagon review endorsed by the inspector general.

    The review found potential excess profits for 98 of 100 parts sampled and concluded the Pentagon may end up paying TransDigm $91 million more in coming years for parts valued at $28 million, with excess profit per part of 95% to the 9,380%, the Defense Department’s inspector general said in an audit labeled “For Official Use Only” and obtained by Bloomberg News.

    As the Pentagon weighs whether to recommend legislation to require more disclosure by contractors, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform will review the audit and TransDigm’s pricing policies in a hearing on Wednesday.
    In almost every case the cost is driven by idiotic government people who cut and paste requirements instead of formulating requirements specific to the contract. Once a requirement is levied the contractor must prove they met the requirement.

    Developing requirements is an engineering function. The government lacks the expertise so they fake it.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-15-2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts