Top 28 Moments From Bombshell Barr Interview

[MMC]

'The idea of resisting a democratically elected president and...really changing the norms on the grounds that we have to stop this president, that is where the shredding of our norms and our institutions is occurring.'



1. Mueller ‘Could Have Reached a Conclusion’ <<<<<
2. DOJ Not an ‘Adjunct to Congress’
3. Mueller’s Guilty Until Proven Innocent Standard ‘Not The Standard We Use’ At DOJ
4. Mueller’s Obstruction Theories ‘Did Not Reflect The Views’ of DOJ
5. Barr Doesn’t Care about ‘Hyper-Partisan’ Complaints
6. Barr ‘Surprised’ by Mueller Not Providing Report Ready to Release
7. Mueller Letter Complaining About Lack of Impeachment Narrative Was ‘A Little Snitty and Staff-Driven’
8. No ‘Discrepancy’ on OLC Opinion <<<<<
9. Response to Russia Threats Troubling
10. FBI’s Wray ‘Very Supportive’ of Investigation Into Russia Probe
11. Spying Is Spying
12. Words Don’t Need to Be Retired Because Trump Uses Them
13. Law Enforcement and Intelligence Should Not Meddle In Elections <<<<<
14. Government Officials Should Not Become a ‘Praetorian Guard’ <<<<<
15. Use of Spy Tools Against Political Campaigns a ‘Serious Red Line’ <<<<<
16. AG Must Protect Against Abuse of Government Power
17. Looking Into Process for Counterintelligence Activities Against Trump Campaign <<<<<
18. Details on Other Investigations
19. Media Supposed to Be ‘Watchdogs’ of ‘Our Civil Liberties’
20. Answers on Trump Campaign Surveillance Not ‘Satisfactory’
21. Failures Not in Rank and File But ‘Upper Echelon’ <<<<<
22. 2016 Meddling ‘Antithetical to the Democratic System’
23. ‘Gross Bias’ of FBI Agents ‘Appalling,’ Would Be Roundly Condemned If about Obama <<<<<
24. Russia Collusion Conspiracy Theory Was ‘Bogus’ <<<<<
25. Media In No Place to ‘Wring Hands’ about Barr’s Declassification Authority
26. Barr Expected Criticism for Upholding Rule of Law
27. ‘Everyone Dies’
28. Resistance Is ‘Shredding Our Institutions’.....snip~ <<<<<

https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/03...arr-interview/

Read those with arrows. Democrats have some serious problems coming down the pipe. Oh and Hillary's Russian Collusion Conspiracy was Bogus. It was an outright lie and the Demos jumped all in. Time for them to pay a price and that means not just losing an election.

[DGUtley]

You got a link?

[MMC]

You got a link?

Ooops my bad. Yep.


https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/03...arr-interview/


There goes the lefts excuse about the OLC.

[MMC]

8. No ‘Discrepancy’ on OLC Opinion

In a press conference, and in his report, Mueller claimed to believe that an Office of Legal Counsel opinion about presidents not being able to be indicted meant that he couldn’t even analyze whether Trump’s frustration at years of false allegations that he was a traitor constituted obstruction.
Previously, Barr said Mueller had assured him that the OLC opinion had not been the reason he hadn’t determined Trump obstructed justice. The two put out a joint statement saying that there was no discrepancy between what they were saying. Barr explained that Mueller did not even analyze whether there was a crime......snip~



There goes the lefts main talking point about the Office of the OLC. Right out the window and into the garbage. Send all lefties to read it and weep. Help increase their TDS. Put them into a deeper state of depression.

[MMC]

Why The IG Report On FISA Abuse Will Unleash Barr’s Investigation Of Spygate


The forthcoming report from the Office of Inspector General on potential Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse will finally unleash Attorney General William Barr, and when it does, watch out.


For the last month, conservative pundits have predicted the ever-imminent dropping of Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report on his investigation into the circumstances surrounding FISA surveillance of former Trump campaign advisor Carter Page. Horowitz’s report will likely provide new and damaging details surrounding the FBI’s use of the FISA court to spy on Page. More importantly, the conclusion of Horowitz’s probe frees Barr to conduct a broader and more exacting investigation into all aspects of the Russia collusion hoax.



Barr revealed this during his interview last week with “CBS This Morning’s” Jan Crawford. In his hour-long interview, Barr made several points clear. First, Barr confirmed that Horowitz’s investigation focused on a discrete aspect of the Russia collusion investigation—the electronic surveillance of Page. (Barr had previously stated that he anticipated receiving Horowitz’s conclusions concerning the propriety of the FISA process targeting Page in May or June, which makes the fevered predictions that Barr already had the IG report less impressive.)


Second, Barr explained that the norm for the Department of Justice was for investigations to be put “on hold while the Office of Inspector General conduct[s] its review.” Barr had suggested the same in his testimony last month before the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Further, while Sessions purported to sidestep that concern by appointing Huber to assist in the investigation as necessary, as we know now, the mere existence of the IG investigation “handicapped” the DOJ. By refusing to expand Horowitz’s probe, Barr has ensured that is no longer the case.


and Barr’s selection of U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead the investigation, suggests it will only be a matter of time before the deluge.....snip~


https://thefederalist.com/2019/06/07...ation-spygate/


Bout time.