It certainly is. A religious official withholding a sacrament of his church to two individuals for the way they voted? Again, I'm not suggesting in any way that this is a matter for the courts, or for legislative or executive action; I thought I'd made it pretty clear in my first post that this move by the Bishop was more in the "bad idea" category. And again, it's hypocritical on his part to expect the secular State to be hands-off in ecclesial matters, and then do something like this.
I'm not really understanding your point here, T. Are you suggesting that government should not be doing that? Perhaps I'm wrong in assuming that you are generally in the anti-choice camp, but if you are - how do you make something illegal without involving government?