Speaking of Hypocrites

[Agent Zero]

The problem with hypocrisy is twofold. One, one you start finding it, you'll find it everywhere you look. It's like a disease. Two, argument from hypocrisy is a logical fallacy.

Lol at the alt right cucks trying to turn their hypocrisy around ala’ the chief trumpanzee Trump rather than admitting they’re mere ignorant failures.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffp...14164043a4/amp

[Chris]

Lol at the alt right cucks trying to turn their hypocrisy around ala’ the chief trumpanzee Trump rather than admitting they’re mere ignorant failures.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.huffp...14164043a4/amp

I don't understand what you were trying to say but that linked article was a good explanation of whataboutism/argument from hypocrisy/tu quoque.

The origin has to be Roman though, not Russian.

Don't forget Pee Wee's famous reversal:

[donttread]

^^

Illiberals and their failure to measure up to reality

. Always demonstrating their inferiority and why they dont belong in politics.

LMAO.


There is a lot of hypocrisy at work in contemporary politics—no doubt we all have our favourite examples, from the moralising adulterers to the mudslinging do-gooders. But although it is fairly easy to point the finger at all this hypocrisy, it is much harder to know what, if anything, to do about it. The problem is that hypocrisy, though inherently unattractive, is also more or less inevitable in most political settings, and in liberal democratic societies it is practically ubiquitous....


Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power, from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond DAVID RUNCIMAN


https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7st00

What to do about it? Well anyone who wants change can vote for people and parties that do not display hypocrisy. Or keep voting "A" or "B" for more of the same.

[Captdon]

What to do about it? Well anyone who wants change can vote for people and parties that do not display hypocrisy. Or keep voting "A" or "B" for more of the same.

It will beA or B no matter what you think. Trump is an independent but he needed the Republicans to win. He had top agree to put mon=liberals on the Court to win.

[mamooth]

For the next decade, any time any conservative claims to not be a flaming moral relativist hypocrite, someone will merely have to say the word "Trump", and the entire room will bust up laughing at how bad of a liar that conservative is.

They all smooch the butt of a disgusting human being, and make up excuses for doing so. That makes them flaming moral relativist hypocrites.

And boy howdy, do they ever hate it when people point that out and laugh at them. They frantically try to change the topic away from the buttkissing of a moral leper. Their favorite method, as used regularly by most of the Trump cultsts here, is some variation on "I know you are, but what I am I?". Another popular one is to just scream "You're a kook!".

In any case, their refusal to address the core issue tells you all you need to know. They know they're hypocrites, but TheParty orders them to be hypocrites, and they lack the guts to stand up to TheParty.

[Collateral Damage]

For the next decade, any time any conservative claims to not be a flaming moral relativist hypocrite, someone will merely have to say the word "Trump", and the entire room will bust up laughing at how bad of a liar that conservative is.
They all smooch the butt of a disgusting human being, and make up excuses for doing so. That makes them flaming moral relativist hypocrites.
And boy howdy, do they ever hate it when people point that out and laugh at them. They frantically try to change the topic away from the buttkissing of a moral leper. Their favorite method, as used regularly by most of the Trump cultsts here, is some variation on "I know you are, but what I am I?". Another popular one is to just scream "You're a kook!".
In any case, their refusal to address the core issue tells you all you need to know. They know they're hypocrites, but TheParty orders them to be hypocrites, and they lack the guts to stand up to TheParty.

Take a good look at what you've posted. Then take a good look at what party you apparently support, and then try and declare either one 'morally superior'. Neither one is, and neither one will ever be.

You've wasted your breath.

[Tahuyaman]

What to do about it? Well anyone who wants change can vote for people and parties that do not display hypocrisy. Or keep voting "A" or "B" for more of the same.

And just who would that be who is free of hypocrisies?

[Tahuyaman]

For the next decade, any time any conservative claims to not be a flaming moral relativist hypocrite, someone will merely have to say the word "Trump", and the entire room will bust up laughing at how bad of a liar that conservative is.

They all smooch the butt of a disgusting human being, and make up excuses for doing so. That makes them flaming moral relativist hypocrites.

And boy howdy, do they ever hate it when people point that out and laugh at them. They frantically try to change the topic away from the buttkissing of a moral leper. Their favorite method, as used regularly by most of the Trump cultsts here, is some variation on "I know you are, but what I am I?". Another popular one is to just scream "You're a kook!".

In any case, their refusal to address the core issue tells you all you need to know. They know they're hypocrites, but TheParty orders them to be hypocrites, and they lack the guts to stand up to TheParty.

A partisan hack always assumes a conservative is always a Republican.

[Bo-4]

Gaetz, Nunes, Meadows and Jordan are the Cream of the Hypocritical/ #Deplorable Crop.

Who keeps electing these clowns?

[Bo-4]

I don't understand what you were trying to say but that linked article was a good explanation of whataboutism/argument from hypocrisy/tu quoque.

The origin has to be Roman though, not Russian.

Don't forget Pee Wee's famous reversal:

Gotta point out Chris, that Trump and his adoring flock are the KINGS of the Pee Wee Syndrome!

https://theweek.com/speedreads/80548...-what-doctrine