User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Can an executor be sued personally for debts of the estate?

  1. #1
    Points: 13,636, Level: 28
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 814
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Lummy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2097
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5,649
    Points
    13,636
    Level
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,365
    Thanked 2,096x in 1,575 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Can an executor be sued personally for debts of the estate?

    Can an estate executor actually be sued personally for the debts of the deceased whose money is depleted from paying off debts already? I heard on talk radio that an executor could be held personally liable for debts still outstanding of the estate, and I don't believe it. It has to be nonsense. Who would be an executor if it meant risking your own financial existence for stuff that might come at you from out of nowhere that you knew nothing about and were never your problem in the first place?

    The parties suing the executor in this case were members of her own family.
    You will rue forever that you ever supported the post-2007 democrat party.

  2. #2
    Points: 1,909, Level: 10
    Level completed: 15%, Points required for next Level: 341
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered1000 Experience Points
    Collateral Damage's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    586
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    747
    Points
    1,909
    Level
    10
    Thanks Given
    867
    Thanked 576x in 367 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For the most part, no, the Executor is not responsible for the deceased debts. They ARE responsible for timely payment of debts, and prioritizing those debts.

    https://info.legalzoom.com/executor-responsible-debts-4720.html
    I never lose.... I either win, or I learn.

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Collateral Damage For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (06-10-2019),Lummy (06-10-2019)

  4. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 524,078, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    425868
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    157,554
    Points
    524,078
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    92,527
    Thanked 76,844x in 51,965 Posts
    Mentioned
    2214 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The answer isn't easy. The general rule is money in the estate should be used to pay the decedent's debt. However state law will rank creditors- for instance credit card debt is last. The executor is not liable for estate debts, but if they improperly pay any of the decedent's debt that is on them. So don't pay anything; keep the estate money where it is until probate is over and the judge has directed where the money goes.

    Smart people pass as much of their money outside of their estate. That is a way to leave the creditors holding the bag. An example, life insurance pay-outs pass to the person listed in the contract, it does not go through the estate.
    Molon labe
    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (06-10-2019),Lummy (06-10-2019)

  6. #4
    Points: 1,945, Level: 10
    Level completed: 24%, Points required for next Level: 305
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered1000 Experience PointsTagger Second Class
    EvilCat Breath's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    461
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    710
    Points
    1,945
    Level
    10
    Thanks Given
    9
    Thanked 451x in 306 Posts
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not without some allegation of negligence or breach of fiduciary duty. I have never heard of an executor being sued by a debt holder. Now, a beneficiary, that's different.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to EvilCat Breath For This Useful Post:

    Lummy (06-11-2019)

  8. #5
    Points: 13,636, Level: 28
    Level completed: 10%, Points required for next Level: 814
    Overall activity: 31.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Lummy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2097
    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    5,649
    Points
    13,636
    Level
    28
    Thanks Given
    1,365
    Thanked 2,096x in 1,575 Posts
    Mentioned
    28 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure, but I think she was both executor and one of the beneficiaries since she was a family member.

    That might explain much, I guess.
    Last edited by Lummy; 06-11-2019 at 04:07 AM.
    You will rue forever that you ever supported the post-2007 democrat party.

  9. #6
    Points: 32,242, Level: 43
    Level completed: 86%, Points required for next Level: 208
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    155702
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    10,958
    Points
    32,242
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    4,374
    Thanked 8,335x in 5,136 Posts
    Mentioned
    141 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My attorney always tells me, "You can sue the Pope for rape -- but you might not win," indicating that you can sue for virtually anything but frivolous suits will likely be dismissed.
    I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.
    ~Leonardo da Vinci

  10. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 524,078, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    425868
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    157,554
    Points
    524,078
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    92,527
    Thanked 76,844x in 51,965 Posts
    Mentioned
    2214 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FindersKeepers View Post
    My attorney always tells me, "You can sue the Pope for rape -- but you might not win," indicating that you can sue for virtually anything but frivolous suits will likely be dismissed.
    Judges can impose sanctions for frivolous suits (like Stormy's), but most judges don't use that tool.
    Molon labe
    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    FindersKeepers (06-12-2019)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO