Senior Member
In each case, an extremely small percentage of something proves to be dangerous and hurts or kills people, and certain individuals therefore don't believe that anyone should own one. What's difficult to understand about that? Is the analogy perfect? No. No analogy is...but it is perfectly accurate in a number of respects.Originally Posted by Private Pickle
“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard
"Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak." - Larry McMurtry
Advisor
One is a right the other is not...
I find your lack of faith...disturbing...
-Darth Vader
Senior Member
The only thing supporting that assertion is your undefended opinion. "I believe it because it's true, and it's true because I believe it". Seems rather circular, doesn't it?
“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard
"Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak." - Larry McMurtry
Advisor
I have posted link after link and court case after court case backing that assertion. Just because you ignore doesn’t make that fact invalid.
I find your lack of faith...disturbing...
-Darth Vader
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote