User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 19 FirstFirst ... 4101112131415161718 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 186

Thread: Why does our society keep and add unenforceable bans?

  1. #131
    Points: 173,687, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,963
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88678
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,092
    Points
    173,687
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,455
    Thanked 20,646x in 14,858 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    You pay the same rate on your investment income. We all pay our legal rate. You realize that whether someone is “rich” depends on what side of the street you are standing on?
    Didn't Mitt Romney once average 20% on something like 47 million? That side of the street is rich and does not pay the tax bracket they are in no matter where you are standing. Money made from wholesome activities like corporate raiding and jobs destruction.But don't worry I don't particularly like "working man loopholes" either. Why reward people for continuing to have kids in an over populated country in an over populated world? I'd eventually like to see a consumption tax but first the super rich need to pay back some of what they have not paid because of undue influence in order to start to pay down the debt payola sent their way helped create.

  2. #132
    Points: 173,687, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,963
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88678
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,092
    Points
    173,687
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,455
    Thanked 20,646x in 14,858 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Why are you so envious of successful people?

    The envy drips from you. You are a Marxist through and through.

    Well if you say so it must be.... BS

  3. #133
    Points: 173,687, Level: 99
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 3,963
    Overall activity: 30.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    donttread's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    88678
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    52,092
    Points
    173,687
    Level
    99
    Thanks Given
    18,455
    Thanked 20,646x in 14,858 Posts
    Mentioned
    319 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Meanwhile back at the thread topic. We apparently have a president who wants to ban the destruction of the symbol of our "freedom". Does anyone else find that pathetic AND laughable at the same time?

  4. #134

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 479,552, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 69.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteranRecommendation First ClassOverdrive
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    201359
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    53,451
    Points
    479,552
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    17,192
    Thanked 46,629x in 25,166 Posts
    Mentioned
    892 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    Didn't Mitt Romney once average 20% on something like 47 million? That side of the street is rich and does not pay the tax bracket they are in no matter where you are standing. Money made from wholesome activities like corporate raiding and jobs destruction.But don't worry I don't particularly like "working man loopholes" either. Why reward people for continuing to have kids in an over populated country in an over populated world? I'd eventually like to see a consumption tax but first the super rich need to pay back some of what they have not paid because of undue influence in order to start to pay down the debt payola sent their way helped create.
    If he paid 20%, he paid his legal rate. Why do you have a problem with that? The justification for a lower tax rate on capital gains relative to ordinary income is threefold: it is not indexed for inflation, it is a double tax, and it encourages present consumption over future consumption. Remember, Wages are first taxed by payroll and personal income taxes, then again by the corporate income tax if one chooses to invest in corporate equities, and then again when those investments pay off in the form of dividends and capital gains.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  5. #135
    Points: 435,862, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308620
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,810
    Points
    435,862
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,287
    Thanked 77,635x in 56,021 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
    I can't speak for him, but you could refer to the capital gains tax's lower rates (as compared with the brackets set for income tax rates) as a perk used by the wealthy. Typically, wealthy people make a lot of revenue off of capital gains as compared with their standard income.

    That being said, we can't raise the rates too much, or that affects overall economic growth. I think a lot of the left doesn't understand the importance of things like investment as compared with consumption.
    The fact remains that those in the higher tax brackets pay a higher capital gains rate than those in the lower tax brackets.

  6. #136
    Points: 435,862, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308620
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    184,810
    Points
    435,862
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    20,287
    Thanked 77,635x in 56,021 Posts
    Mentioned
    707 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    If he paid 20%, he paid his legal rate. Why do you have a problem with that? The justification for a lower tax rate on capital gains relative to ordinary income is threefold: it is not indexed for inflation, it is a double tax, and it encourages present consumption over future consumption. Remember, Wages are first taxed by payroll and personal income taxes, then again by the corporate income tax if one chooses to invest in corporate equities, and then again when those investments pay off in the form of dividends and capital gains.
    Yes, the money which generated the capital gain has been taxed already probably more than once. Too many people are just tax crazy. Tax everything as often as they can.

  7. #137
    Points: 265,774, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 65.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First ClassOverdrive
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    308019
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Northern Alabama
    Posts
    104,863
    Points
    265,774
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    94,902
    Thanked 39,393x in 27,951 Posts
    Mentioned
    389 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
    I should correct what I said earlier. He didn't end the SALT deduction. He capped it. However, the cap was still high enough that it didn't affect most people in most states. Only the really high taxing states affected a lot of people.

    As far as capital gains go, I can see both sides on that. On the one hand, you don't want to discourage investment. On the other hand, it could probably be a little higher without affecting investment much.
    Like many closet Marxists you believe the State owns the wealth. We little people are allowed to only keep some small amount of what we produce. The government can do with far less of our wealth. Takings should be capped for government across all levels at 10% of what we earn.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  8. #138
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by donttread View Post
    Didn't Mitt Romney once average 20% on something like 47 million? That side of the street is rich and does not pay the tax bracket they are in no matter where you are standing. Money made from wholesome activities like corporate raiding and jobs destruction.But don't worry I don't particularly like "working man loopholes" either. Why reward people for continuing to have kids in an over populated country in an over populated world? I'd eventually like to see a consumption tax but first the super rich need to pay back some of what they have not paid because of undue influence in order to start to pay down the debt payola sent their way helped create.
    "Corporate raiding" is a term made up by people who don't know what they are talking about.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-18-2019)

  10. #139
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    If he paid 20%, he paid his legal rate. Why do you have a problem with that? The justification for a lower tax rate on capital gains relative to ordinary income is threefold: it is not indexed for inflation, it is a double tax, and it encourages present consumption over future consumption. Remember, Wages are first taxed by payroll and personal income taxes, then again by the corporate income tax if one chooses to invest in corporate equities, and then again when those investments pay off in the form of dividends and capital gains.
    Mitt pays more in taxes in 1 year than the bone-heads who claim he doesn't pay enough pay in their entire lives.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    DGUtley (06-18-2019),MisterVeritis (06-18-2019)

  12. #140
    Points: 84,771, Level: 70
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 79
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12861
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Charleston South Carolina
    Posts
    38,391
    Points
    84,771
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    67,859
    Thanked 12,872x in 10,160 Posts
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Rationalist View Post
    Well, that was a good policy to implement, because, before that, the status quo basically incentivized states to tax their residents more.

    By ending the SALT deduction, high tax state residents truly feel how much their state is screwing them. This will hopefully result in more people in these states demanding lower state taxes.
    I liked the part where he says "Your President." A secret liberal getting outed.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our nation
    Pick your enemies carefully.






+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts