It was accurate. The basic problem is that you're uninformed, but you don't understand that, because you've never been informed of the basics.
Here are a few quick examples. There are many more. As this addresses more advanced topics, it won't require the tutoring fee.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/23/c...l-warming.html
---
In recent years, though, researchers have begun to realize that the extra carbon dioxide that humanity is pumping into the atmosphere isn’t just warming the planet, it’s also making some of our most important crops less nutritious by changing their chemical makeup and diluting vitamins and minerals.
---
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/29/m...29weeds-t.html
---
Not only did the weeds grow much larger in hotter, CO2-enriched plots — a weed called lambs-quarters, or Chenopodium album, grew to an impressive 6 to 8 feet on the farm but to a frightening 10 to 12 feet in the city — but the urban, futuristic weeds also produced more pollen. Even more alarming was the way that the increased heat and CO2 accelerated and perverted the succession of species within the plots. Typically, a cleared area in the Eastern United States, if left to itself, returns to native woodland. This process varies with the site and circumstances, but in its archetypical form fast-growing annual weeds cover the soil first, playing the role of what ecologists classify as “pioneer plants.” These gradually give way to longer-lived perennial weeds, which are in turn replaced by shrubs and trees.
In the natural version of this process, the pioneers and their successors are species indigenous to the area, and the woodland’s restoration takes decades. But what Ziska observed in his urban plots was ecology on amphetamines, a nearly completed succession to trees by the end of five years, with a domination by invasive weed trees of the most troublesome sort: ailanthus, Norway maples and mulberries. Five years after the creation of the plots, the biggest ailanthus in the rural test site measured about five feet tall. The city site boasted a 20-footer. The suburban plot was following the city’s lead, though it lagged a couple of years behind.
https://www.everydayhealth.com/poiso...vy-more-toxic/
---
In a 2006 study, a team led by Duke University researchers pumped extra CO2 over three plots in a North Carolina pine forest. Over a six-year period in a CO2-enriched environment, poison ivy grew larger leaves and produced a more toxic form of the sap oil, urushiol, that causes the allergic reactions. Researchers found that while the average tree grew about 8 percent faster in the CO2-enriched area, poison ivy sprouted 149 percent faster than it would have under normal carbon dioxide conditions.
That’s because of photosynthesis. Trees use up some of the carbohydrates building their support structures, such as trunks, bark, and branches. But vines don’t waste their energy, and use trees, fences, and other structures for support, enabling them to grow more leafy surfaces. This allows them to consume more CO2, making more plant food, which then creates more CO2-absorbing leaves, in a continual positive feedback loop.
---
True. Given the degree of hostility towards learning that you've displayed, and given how good I am, $50/hr was a laughably low offer. To compensate for my frustration, I'll have to raise that to $100/hr.
Not possible, as "zero" can't be more than anything. All you've contributed is unsupported assertions, most of them incorrect.
As that has nothing to do with anything I've talked about, that does fall under "Explaining the basics to you", and would thus require payment up front.
If you've got a point to make there, then state it outright. Don't keep asking me to make your point for you. If you can't make a point yourself, just say so. Trying to play gotcha-question-games with me just makes you look even more evasive.