User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 20 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 193

Thread: John Roberts Decides To Help the Enemy Hide The Number of Infiltrates in the US

  1. #1
    Points: 13,559, Level: 28
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 891
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Sergeant Gleed's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2044
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Right Now? The Planet Gand
    Posts
    4,872
    Points
    13,559
    Level
    28
    Thanks Given
    492
    Thanked 2,036x in 1,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    John Roberts Decides To Help the Enemy Hide The Number of Infiltrates in the US

    No link, sorry.

    But Chief Justice Roberts, who famously sold America down the river of MessiahCare, has once again struck a blow for tyranny.

    His one vote, his one unelected for life vote, sent the decision about something as simple as the Citizenship Question in the Census back to the lower court to be redecided.

    The form has to be submitted to the printer on the first of July.

    Fascism wins another round.

    Unless Trump flatly orders the form to include the question sent to the printers.

    He too has a phone and a pen.
    Freedom Requires Obstinance.

    We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Sergeant Gleed For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (06-27-2019)

  3. #2
    Points: 20,615, Level: 34
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 135
    Overall activity: 2.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassVeteranSocial50000 Experience Points
    Beevee's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58490
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Near Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    7,500
    Points
    20,615
    Level
    34
    Thanks Given
    29
    Thanked 1,489x in 1,189 Posts
    Mentioned
    62 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.

  4. #3
    Points: 41,236, Level: 49
    Level completed: 64%, Points required for next Level: 614
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Cletus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    181200
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    18,177
    Points
    41,236
    Level
    49
    Thanks Given
    16
    Thanked 12,885x in 8,023 Posts
    Mentioned
    191 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Beevee View Post
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.
    What does that have to do with a citizenship question on the census?
    "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury Vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803). "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda Vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cletus For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (07-23-2019),Tahuyaman (06-27-2019)

  6. #4
    Points: 216,652, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    268967
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    95,918
    Points
    216,652
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    11,026
    Thanked 37,950x in 28,382 Posts
    Mentioned
    455 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Cletus View Post
    What does that have to do with a citizenship question on the census?
    I don't know why anyone would oppose determining how many people residing in the US are actually citizens.

  7. #5
    Points: 216,652, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdrive
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    268967
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    95,918
    Points
    216,652
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    11,026
    Thanked 37,950x in 28,382 Posts
    Mentioned
    455 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Beevee View Post
    LOL.
    The only thing that will make deplorables happy is the total rape of America by those who yearn for total control of business and society.
    How is determine how many people in the US are actual citizens facilitating the "total rape of America" or giving businesses complete control of society?

  8. #6

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 81,705, Level: 69
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 745
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    170025
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    19,895
    Points
    81,705
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    6,786
    Thanked 15,287x in 8,777 Posts
    Mentioned
    534 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think that SCOTUS was suspicious of the intent as to why this was put on there. I think that they found the Administration's argument to be argle-bargle.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to DGUtley For This Useful Post:

    Standing Wolf (06-27-2019)

  10. #7
    Points: 132,265, Level: 87
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 385
    Overall activity: 95.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First Class
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    289980
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    61,608
    Points
    132,265
    Level
    87
    Thanks Given
    48,303
    Thanked 21,347x in 16,349 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    I think that SCOTUS was suspicious of the intent as to why this was put on there. I think that they found the Administration's argument to be argle-bargle.
    Suspicion is not a constitutional argument.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Sergeant Gleed (06-27-2019)

  12. #8
    Points: 34,555, Level: 45
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 895
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    304151
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    12,507
    Points
    34,555
    Level
    45
    Thanks Given
    2,184
    Thanked 10,255x in 5,909 Posts
    Mentioned
    301 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    Suspicion is not a constitutional argument.
    No, it isn't...but when evidence of bad intent and motives - in this case, an attempt to provide some advantage to one political Party by adding the question to the census - is presented to the Court, it is the Court's duty to consider that evidence in their deliberations, and in their final decision. Previous courts have already ruled on the sort of questions that can, for statistical purposes, be added to the census, and attempting to do so for partisan reasons has never been found to be acceptable.

    Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution mandates an enumeration of "free Persons", and directs that Congressional representation should be based on those numbers. Nothing in that clause, or in the deliberations of the Founders, would indicate that citizenship should in any way be a factor to be considered in either procedure.
    “Inside of me there are two dogs. One is mean and evil and the other is good and they fight each other all the time. When asked which one wins I answer, the one I feed the most.”

    - attributed to Sitting Bull

    "I live by two words: tenacity and gratitude. Tenacity gets me where I want to go, and gratitude keeps me from being angry on the way." - Henry Winkler

  13. #9
    Points: 132,265, Level: 87
    Level completed: 89%, Points required for next Level: 385
    Overall activity: 95.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First Class
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    289980
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    61,608
    Points
    132,265
    Level
    87
    Thanks Given
    48,303
    Thanked 21,347x in 16,349 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    No, it isn't...but when evidence of bad intent and motives - in this case, an attempt to provide some advantage to one political Party by adding the question to the census - is presented to the Court, it is the Court's duty to consider that evidence in their deliberations, and in their final decision. Previous courts have already ruled on the sort of questions that can, for statistical purposes, be added to the census, and attempting to do so for partisan reasons has never been found to be acceptable.

    Article 1, Section 2 of the U.S. Constitution mandates an enumeration of "free Persons", and directs that Congressional representation should be based on those numbers. Nothing in that clause, or in the deliberations of the Founders, would indicate that citizenship should in any way be a factor to be considered in either procedure.
    The court is required to base decisions on Constitutional arguments. The court, once again, failed. The court had one job to do and it failed. Is it legal to ask citizenship? Yes or no?

    It will be very enlightening to Americans, I mean real Americans, when we discover we have 50-60 million non-citizens in the country. That is why people on your team fight it so hard.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Sergeant Gleed (06-27-2019)

  15. #10
    Points: 34,555, Level: 45
    Level completed: 41%, Points required for next Level: 895
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    304151
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    12,507
    Points
    34,555
    Level
    45
    Thanks Given
    2,184
    Thanked 10,255x in 5,909 Posts
    Mentioned
    301 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MisterVeritis View Post
    The court is required to base decisions on Constitutional arguments. The court, once again, failed. The court had one job to do and it failed. Is it legal to ask citizenship? Yes or no?

    It will be very enlightening to Americans, I mean real Americans, when we discover we have 50-60 million non-citizens in the country. That is why people on your team fight it so hard.
    You are, of course, free to comment on anything you choose, but if you want people to take you seriously when you bring up or comment on legal matters, it would behoove you to first obtain some legal education.
    “Inside of me there are two dogs. One is mean and evil and the other is good and they fight each other all the time. When asked which one wins I answer, the one I feed the most.”

    - attributed to Sitting Bull

    "I live by two words: tenacity and gratitude. Tenacity gets me where I want to go, and gratitude keeps me from being angry on the way." - Henry Winkler

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO