User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed

  1. #1
    Points: 456,299, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 74.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    396801
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    148,673
    Points
    456,299
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    15,284
    Thanked 44,374x in 32,672 Posts
    Mentioned
    1715 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed

    Unconstitutional? No kidding. About time the administrative state is challenged.

    The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed

    ...For the better part of a century, the Court has permitted Congress to delegate broad policymaking authority to federal agencies. The Court has not struck down a statute under the non-delegation doctrine since 1935, when a conservative majority was hostile to progressive New Deal measures aimed at protecting workers and consumers. Since then, the increasing complexity of modern industrialized society has made it obvious that—even when Congress is not as dysfunctional as it is now—it’s not possible for Congress to legislate the technical details necessary to regulate the environment, health, safety, labor, education, energy, elections, discrimination, housing, and the economy.

    As a result, executive agencies create regulations and implement binding policies. That has long been understood as both necessary for the country to function and consistent with the Constitution. The Court has applied a test: if a statute gives an agency discretion that is sufficiently constrained by an “intelligible principle,” then Congress is not unconstitutionally delegating legislative power. But many conservatives complain that that test has been applied in a lax way, so that any statute delegating any scope of authority appears to satisfy it. For example, the Court has repeatedly upheld statutes that give agencies only general guidance, such as to regulate in the “public interest,” or issue air quality standards “requisite to protect the public health.”

    In Gundy, all four liberal Justices, in a plurality opinion by Justice Elena Kagan, hewed to the prevailing approach, finding that Congress provided enough guidance limiting the agency’s discretion to pass constitutional muster. Three conservative Justices, in a dissent by Justice Neil Gorsuch, said that the law impermissibly gave the Attorney General “free rein to write the rules,” and was unconstitutional. Justice Samuel Alito cast the deciding vote that enabled the liberals to prevail this time, but his three-paragraph concurrence made clear that the victory may be short-lived. He said that if the majority “were willing to reconsider the approach we have taken for the past 84 years, I would support that effort.” A conservative majority was lacking here because of the absence of Justice Kavanaugh. Next time there’s a similar case before the Court, his vote will make for a different result.

    We are now explicitly on notice that the Court will likely abandon its longstanding tolerance of Congress delegating broadly to agencies. What’s at stake is the potential upending of the constitutional foundations of the so-called “administrative state.” Today’s reality is that agencies, not Congress, make most federal laws. As Justice Kagan put it, if the delegation in Gundy were unconstitutional, “then most of Government is unconstitutional.”...
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Admiral Ackbar (07-04-2019),Captdon (07-04-2019),stjames1_53 (07-04-2019)

  3. #2

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 14,739, Level: 29
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 711
    Overall activity: 21.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassYour first Group10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Admiral Ackbar's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    1923
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,600
    Points
    14,739
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    1,377
    Thanked 1,913x in 1,233 Posts
    Mentioned
    35 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Although the dyke Justice from Harvard is probably shocked by it. The fact is most of the Federal Government IS illegal!
    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining"----Fletcher in The Outlaw Josey Wales

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Admiral Ackbar For This Useful Post:

    stjames1_53 (07-04-2019)

  5. #3
    Points: 128,909, Level: 86
    Level completed: 90%, Points required for next Level: 341
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteranTagger First Class
    MisterVeritis's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    289349
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Madison
    Posts
    60,113
    Points
    128,909
    Level
    86
    Thanks Given
    46,284
    Thanked 20,714x in 15,891 Posts
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Unconstitutional? No kidding. About time the administrative state is challenged.

    The Supreme Court Is One Vote Away from Changing How the U.S. Is Governed
    FDR's coup may be reversed. Good.
    Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.


    I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.

  6. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MisterVeritis For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (07-04-2019),stjames1_53 (07-04-2019)

  7. #4
    Points: 13,559, Level: 28
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 891
    Overall activity: 39.0%
    Achievements:
    VeteranTagger Second Class10000 Experience Points
    Sergeant Gleed's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2044
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Right Now? The Planet Gand
    Posts
    4,872
    Points
    13,559
    Level
    28
    Thanks Given
    492
    Thanked 2,036x in 1,585 Posts
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Admiral Ackbar View Post
    Although the dyke Justice from Harvard is probably shocked by it. The fact is most of the Federal Government IS illegal!
    You have to be more specific. There are at least two "dyke justices", three if you count Roberts .
    Freedom Requires Obstinance.

    We the People DID NOT vote in a majority Rodent Congress, they stole it via election fraud.

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sergeant Gleed For This Useful Post:

    Admiral Ackbar (07-04-2019),MisterVeritis (07-04-2019)

  9. #5

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 76,848, Level: 67
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 902
    Overall activity: 50.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    169382
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    18,724
    Points
    76,848
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    6,452
    Thanked 14,644x in 8,404 Posts
    Mentioned
    499 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO