User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 57

Thread: Tempe Police officers claim they were asked to leave Starbucks because a customer fel

  1. #21
    Points: 21,522, Level: 35
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 428
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    Collateral Damage's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6810
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    8,045
    Points
    21,522
    Level
    35
    Thanks Given
    11,704
    Thanked 6,800x in 4,160 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Weird, I thought it was perfectly fine for an establishment to decide who they serve?
    Oh wait, I forgot where I was....
    They had already been served. It had nothing to do with who had been served, and what they were served... it was a customer who felt 'unsafe'.

    Not even close to that subject.
    "I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." -- James Madison

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Collateral Damage For This Useful Post:

    Mister D (07-08-2019),MMC (07-08-2019)

  3. #22
    Original Ranter
    Points: 297,679, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416525
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    117,861
    Points
    297,679
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,296
    Thanked 53,470x in 36,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Weird, I thought it was perfectly fine for an establishment to decide who they serve?

    Oh wait, I forgot where I was....
    Looks like you forgot what the topic was too. LOL
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Mister D For This Useful Post:

    MMC (07-08-2019)

  5. #23
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Collateral Damage View Post
    They had already been served. It had nothing to do with who had been served, and what they were served... it was a customer who felt 'unsafe'.

    Not even close to that subject.
    They were asked to leave by that Starbuck’s, were they not? In the other case, two men were arrested for trespassing after having the cops called on them at a different Starbuck’s, were they not?

    Why are those that were $#@!sure that Starbuck’s have the ability to choose who they serve, when they serve them, suddenly say they should not have removed the cops in this incident?

    Rhetorical question.
    “Conscientiously believing that the proper condition of the negro is slavery, or a complete subjection to the white man, and entertaining the belief that the day is not distant when the old Union will be restored with slavery nationally declared to be the proper condition of all of African descent, and in view of the future harmony and progress of all the States of America, I have been induced to issue this address, so that there may be no misunderstanding in the future”

    - Jefferson Davis

  6. #24
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    Looks like you forgot what the topic was too. LOL

    Looks like you prefer to make your participation in this thread about me, rather than the topic. LoL
    “Conscientiously believing that the proper condition of the negro is slavery, or a complete subjection to the white man, and entertaining the belief that the day is not distant when the old Union will be restored with slavery nationally declared to be the proper condition of all of African descent, and in view of the future harmony and progress of all the States of America, I have been induced to issue this address, so that there may be no misunderstanding in the future”

    - Jefferson Davis

  7. #25
    Points: 21,522, Level: 35
    Level completed: 65%, Points required for next Level: 428
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    Collateral Damage's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    6810
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    8,045
    Points
    21,522
    Level
    35
    Thanks Given
    11,704
    Thanked 6,800x in 4,160 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    They were asked to leave by that Starbuck’s, were they not? In the other case, two men were arrested for trespassing after having the cops called on them at a different Starbuck’s, were they not?
    Why are those that were $#@!sure that Starbuck’s have the ability to choose who they serve, when they serve them, suddenly say they should not have removed the cops in this incident?
    Rhetorical question.
    Your not addressing what actually happened, to equate it to previous events.

    Starbucks had already served the LEOs. Starbucks did not have a problem with serving the LEOs. A customer claimed that the LEOs made them 'uncomfortable', and that is why Starbucks asked them to leave.

    To make your comparison work, a customer would have had to complain about who was being served, not the proprietor.....
    "I believe there are more instances of the abridgement of freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments by those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations." -- James Madison

  8. #26
    Original Ranter
    Points: 297,679, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416525
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    117,861
    Points
    297,679
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,296
    Thanked 53,470x in 36,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    Looks like you prefer to make your participation in this thread about me, rather than the topic. LoL
    Your comment was kind of dumb. Don't take everything so personally. It's not always about you.
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Mister D For This Useful Post:

    Tahuyaman (07-08-2019)

  10. #27
    Original Ranter
    Points: 297,679, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416525
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    117,861
    Points
    297,679
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,296
    Thanked 53,470x in 36,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Collateral Damage View Post
    Your not addressing what actually happened, to equate it to previous events.

    Starbucks had already served the LEOs. Starbucks did not have a problem with serving the LEOs. A customer claimed that the LEOs made them 'uncomfortable', and that is why Starbucks asked them to leave.

    To make your comparison work, a customer would have had to complain about who was being served, not the proprietor.....
    He searches for hypocrisy everywhere, finds it everywhere and...well, you get stupid commentary.
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


  11. #28
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Collateral Damage View Post
    Your not addressing what actually happened, to equate it to previous events.

    Starbucks had already served the LEOs. Starbucks did not have a problem with serving the LEOs. A customer claimed that the LEOs made them 'uncomfortable', and that is why Starbucks asked them to leave.

    To make your comparison work, a customer would have had to complain about who was being served, not the proprietor.....
    No, to make the comparison work in your view, that is what you want the metrics to be. That is not the case when judged by the comments that was made in the Philly Starbucks case. You are creating a whole different argument because the one I presented is not winnable with your premise.
    “Conscientiously believing that the proper condition of the negro is slavery, or a complete subjection to the white man, and entertaining the belief that the day is not distant when the old Union will be restored with slavery nationally declared to be the proper condition of all of African descent, and in view of the future harmony and progress of all the States of America, I have been induced to issue this address, so that there may be no misunderstanding in the future”

    - Jefferson Davis

  12. #29
    Points: 122,776, Level: 84
    Level completed: 98%, Points required for next Level: 74
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsTagger Second ClassVeteran
    Safety's Avatar Nationalist
    Karma
    2616415
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    GA/FL
    Posts
    50,789
    Points
    122,776
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    25,014
    Thanked 22,901x in 15,599 Posts
    Mentioned
    1237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    Your comment was kind of dumb. Don't take everything so personally. It's not always about you.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    He searches for hypocrisy everywhere, finds it everywhere and...well, you get stupid commentary.

    Like I said, I am constantly on your mind and you have to find something/anything to say because you want me to notice you.

    I already have a pet, I don’t need one online.
    “Conscientiously believing that the proper condition of the negro is slavery, or a complete subjection to the white man, and entertaining the belief that the day is not distant when the old Union will be restored with slavery nationally declared to be the proper condition of all of African descent, and in view of the future harmony and progress of all the States of America, I have been induced to issue this address, so that there may be no misunderstanding in the future”

    - Jefferson Davis

  13. #30
    Original Ranter
    Points: 297,679, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Mister D's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    416525
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    117,861
    Points
    297,679
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    25,296
    Thanked 53,470x in 36,445 Posts
    Mentioned
    1102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Safety View Post
    No, to make the comparison work in your view, that is what you want the metrics to be. That is not the case when judged by the comments that was made in the Philly Starbucks case. You are creating a whole different argument because the one I presented is not winnable with your premise.
    lol
    Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.


    ~Alain de Benoist


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts