MisterVeritis (07-15-2019)
They are victimless in the sense that you arer not harming or stealing from anyone else. You are doing what you are doing to yourself. Tobacco is an exception because of 2nd hand smoke.
2) what does exist to regulate judges? It does not seem like they are held to professional standards in the same way doctors, nurses, social workers , lawyers etc are.
3) this guy got 20.
4) That already happens for those who's case isn't worth the big bucks.
5) Stop or limit civil suits that are filed for something the person has been criminally acquitted of.
6) That's a start.
7) Reasonable doubt or reasonable man test.
8) It's partly about federal power over the states and state's rights are no longer fashionable anywhere.
Peter1469 (07-15-2019)
1. Gambling, drugs and prostitution harm families, wives, kids etc.
2. No. There are tens of thousands of decisions made every day. You only hear about the occasional bad one.
3. Then it wasn’t a weapons charge.
4. This makes no sense.
5. No. It is a lesser standard in a ccivil case. If you harm someone you should compensate them.
6. You are welcome.
7. You want to undo the jury by a reasonable person standard when it took beyond a reasonable doubt to convict? I don’t understand why?
8. I agree that SCOTUS was wrong. Not for the reason you say, but I agree.
Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes
Tahuyaman (07-15-2019)
Tahuyaman (07-15-2019)