Thanks for the info.Originally Posted by DGUtley
Senior Member
Thanks for the info.
One can be sure that he who says he knows knows nothing
Senior Member
So I read all these articles and the main critique seems to be the placement of certain individuals on the hate groups list, such as Charles Murray. Those things can be debated as folks such as Murray are certainly controversial. I don't see this however as an overall indictment of what the SPLC does.
One can be sure that he who says he knows knows nothing
Senior Member
The SPLC has an existential interest in discovering as many "hate groups" as possible. For example, Bubba and Travis will be one hate group while Bubba's 2 cousins in another county are of course a separate hate group. Quite frankly, you have to be incredibly naive to believe the SPLC is somehow objective and has the public interest at heart. They would demonize a ham sandwich if it would help their fund raising. Take their "data" with a grain of salt about the size of a basketball.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Senior Member
I take all data with a grain of salt.
One can be sure that he who says he knows knows nothing
Senior Member
If you think the SPLC is a disinterested party either ideologically or financially then, no, you don't.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Senior Member
So did anyone provide actual evidence to the contrary of the OP? DGutley did provide links to the credibility of the source, However was anyone able to find evidence that the left commits more terrorism than the OP suggest?
Senior Member
I never said they were disinterested. Of course they have an adjenda. That doesn't mean that they don't do some good work, and that doesn't mean that one doesn't look at such work with a critical eye without being 100% dismissive of said work.
One can be sure that he who says he knows knows nothing
Senior Member
If they have an agenda they have been discredited. The SPLC is not a public interest watchdog. Glad we agree.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Senior Member
I don't particularly care.
Whoever criticizes capitalism, while approving immigration, whose working class is its first victim, had better shut up. Whoever criticizes immigration, while remaining silent about capitalism, should do the same.
~Alain de Benoist
Senior Member
Having an agenda means one is discredited? Hmmmm...
One can be sure that he who says he knows knows nothing
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote