User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Iowa Cops Buy an Armored Vehicle With $300,000 in Asset Forfeiture Funds

  1. #11

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 327,894, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    331087
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    57,249
    Points
    327,894
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,227
    Thanked 10,289x in 6,442 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alexa View Post
    There is no plausible reason for Barney Fife to have an armored vehicle.

    They'll find one though, and use it.
    Of course you would think that, everyone that doesnt have any knowledge or understanding of what it takes to protect the public has the same myopic view. Police put up with cluelessness all the time, they ignore it and do whatever they are going to do
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  2. #12
    Original Ranter
    Points: 524,677, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    426028
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    157,716
    Points
    524,677
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    92,653
    Thanked 77,004x in 52,065 Posts
    Mentioned
    2214 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Boris The Animal View Post
    Why not when the criminals can typically outgun cops? Do you want MORE police fatalities at the hands of these evil vermin thugs?
    I don't want to crush civil liberties of law abiding citizens because we have a subset criminal class. If the cops have problems with certain areas deputize some citizens to root them out.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  3. #13
    Points: 66,144, Level: 62
    Level completed: 81%, Points required for next Level: 406
    Overall activity: 51.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    41343
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    24,192
    Points
    66,144
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    42,838
    Thanked 12,361x in 9,025 Posts
    Mentioned
    84 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    Of course you would think that, everyone that doesnt have any knowledge or understanding of what it takes to protect the public has the same myopic view. Police put up with cluelessness all the time, they ignore it and do whatever they are going to do
    Law enforcement agencies often have a contract for x number of dollars. they get paid for that contract, if not, the unions step in. I'm not against LEO trying to keep themselves safe on the job. But to use civil forfeiture as a means to reinforcing themselves seems unethical to me.
    How much cash is removed on the road from accusations of it being used in drug deals? When, the fact of the matter, their own cash can't pass the sniff test, and will refuse to allow it because they know that their cash, fresh from the bank, can fail a sniff test. But it is used to secure someone's cash on a random stop.
    I'm not even hinting that they are dirty, and most aren't. But it is a toll used to seize cash roadside. It is damned difficult to get it back.
    That is why I am against roadside stop and seizures. The innocent must spend enormous amounts of cash to get it back and PROVE they aren't guilty of anything.
    It's a bullsh!t ploy used for policing for profit. And you cannot deny it happens. When the cops become highwaymen, there is no defense.
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    Helena (08-17-2019)

  5. #14
    Points: 8,675, Level: 22
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 575
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Helena's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1384
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,074
    Points
    8,675
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    1,907
    Thanked 1,375x in 874 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Feds (who specialize in theft and overspend) want reimbursement for $70K car
    https://www.ajc.com/news/local-govt-...RfCHGO5RlZGsL/

    The federal government previously approved the purchase, which used asset forfeiture funds, but are now questioning if the Hellcat is being used for its stated purpose.
    So much to unpack here. See it or don't.
    Tickling censorship with a feather.

  6. #15

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 327,894, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 84.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrive
    Common's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    331087
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    57,249
    Points
    327,894
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    4,227
    Thanked 10,289x in 6,442 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helena View Post
    Feds (who specialize in theft and overspend) want reimbursement for $70K car
    https://www.ajc.com/news/local-govt-...RfCHGO5RlZGsL/



    So much to unpack here. See it or don't.
    Helena there is no doubt whatsover that all govt agencies from the Fed to local govts at times misappropriate, steal, connive and misuse taxpayer funds.

    So do Political campaigns, Senators and representatives at Federal and state and local level of both parties.

    STEALING and misappropriating is as a part of the govt as hotdogs are to ballparks.

    Thats not the issue here, the issue and gist of your thread was that Police should not have bought an armored vehicle.
    I demonstrated to you that there are needs for armored vehicles and in the past Police have called in the national guard.

    Did you know there are Prison systems that have armored personel carriers to bring officers inside safely during riots to quell it and save lives ?

    I guess some people believe they want the armored vehicle to mow down houses and run over people. There are actually legitimate purposes for it. Not ALL police depts need one of course, most do not.
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

    GROUCHO MARX,

  7. #16
    Points: 16,246, Level: 30
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 204
    Overall activity: 38.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered10000 Experience PointsSocial
    alexa's Avatar Banned
    Karma
    3020
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Posts
    5,795
    Points
    16,246
    Level
    30
    Thanks Given
    2,751
    Thanked 3,010x in 2,180 Posts
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    Of course you would think that, everyone that doesnt have any knowledge or understanding of what it takes to protect the public has the same myopic view. Police put up with cluelessness all the time, they ignore it and do whatever they are going to do
    Yes, frequently cops ignore the public and do whatever they want.

    That would be the problem.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to alexa For This Useful Post:

    Helena (08-17-2019)

  9. #17
    Points: 8,675, Level: 22
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 575
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Helena's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1384
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,074
    Points
    8,675
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    1,907
    Thanked 1,375x in 874 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    First I want to welcome you back Helena

    Theres alot of PDs that have armored personel carriers and the purpose is not nefarious.


    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    If you care to research the incident in LA where two individuals that were fully armored to the point they stood out in the open and police rounds wouldnt harm them, they had automatic assault rifles and shot many people after they robbed a bank and police officers. The Police couldnt get near them they were firing hundreds of rounds .

    These vehicles are used for bombs, for groups of armed individuals and other such situations to get swat teams into a positon to defend or assault safely to protect the public.

    I know full well your disdain for police and I fully realize you wont accept any explanation I could give
    Tickling censorship with a feather.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Helena For This Useful Post:

    Ethereal (08-18-2019)

  11. #18
    Points: 8,675, Level: 22
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 575
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Helena's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1384
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,074
    Points
    8,675
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    1,907
    Thanked 1,375x in 874 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    Police have a right to keep themselves safe, having said that if theres a situation where an armored vehicle would save the day and the PD doesnt have one, I would accept them standing down and the military coming in to solve the issue.
    Citizens have a right to to keep themselves safe from police and if an armored vehicle would save the day, the local militia should have access to as many as they need or want to uphold and preserve their rights against tyranny.
    Tickling censorship with a feather.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Helena For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (08-18-2019)

  13. #19
    Points: 8,675, Level: 22
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 575
    Overall activity: 26.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class5000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Helena's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1384
    Join Date
    Jul 2018
    Posts
    2,074
    Points
    8,675
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    1,907
    Thanked 1,375x in 874 Posts
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    Helena there is no doubt whatsover that all govt agencies from the Fed to local govts at times misappropriate, steal, connive and misuse taxpayer funds.

    So do Political campaigns, Senators and representatives at Federal and state and local level of both parties.

    STEALING and misappropriating is as a part of the govt as hotdogs are to ballparks.

    Thats not the issue here,
    IT very much is AN issue here.

    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    the issue and gist of your thread was that Police should not have bought an armored vehicle.
    Tell me everything you love about civil asset forfeiture.


    Quote Originally Posted by Common View Post
    I demonstrated to you that there are needs for armored vehicles and in the past Police have called in the national guard.

    Did you know there are Prison systems that have armored personel carriers to bring officers inside safely during riots to quell it and save lives ?

    I guess some people believe they want the armored vehicle to mow down houses and run over people. There are actually legitimate purposes for it. Not ALL police depts need one of course, most do not.
    Tickling censorship with a feather.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO