Elizabeth Warren to Native Americans: "I've Made Mistakes"

[Lummy]

Just .

It's gonna be a day.

[The Sage of Main Street]

Now that was funny. Thanks for the best laugh I've had all day, Sage.

Liberals in Fantasyland Tell Jealous Lies About Frontierland

Not as funny as the savages getting what they deserved at Wounded Knee.

Why stand, lone Wolf, when you can dance with the pack, as recommended by the Whiteys Hating Whitey in Hollywood?

[The Sage of Main Street]

If the purchase of Greenland could be negotiated, it would be a good thing

Cowards Owe Something to the Brave Who Free Them


We started losing our way when we didn't demand it as reparations from Denmark for surrendering without a fight in World War II.

[The Sage of Main Street]

She used the Cherokee ethnicity her entire career only recently attempting a 23 and me ploy once again trying to pretend she's an Indian. Cornered and proven wrong, she was forced to apologize. By the way....many on this thread right here were arguing she did have Indian heritage after this dna test. That there was no reason to apologize. Now claiming she has apologized.....because she was wrong....and we need to move on. Just take her beer video and her Indian claims and pretend this isn't a politician through and through......who garners all this excitement......while struggling to break 20% support amongst Democrats. The media is pushing her, that's why her number clicked up 3% or so, she desperately needs the media.

Hush, Hush, Sweet Charlatan


The Pottawannabe should be rated as 1/1026th sincere with her Granny the Nanny act, too. She's a hillary without the ear-rattling screeching.

[Standing Wolf]

and yet a great many people lived to be quite older than that. Not all females or males had children. The average age for those early Americans is right around 45-50 years old. https://www.answers.com/Q/What_was_t...y_in_the_1700s
At the turn of the 20th century, it was quite a bit longer. I use 50 years because for the past 300 years, the length of age greatly increased.
You're trying to enhance her miserable lie as well as justify it. She has no more American Native in her than you or I. Most Europeans had more Indian in their blood that she has.
That was the result of her test. Argue with history.
She failed the "drop" test. So there isn't enough Cherokee in her whole body to register a damned thing. High cheek bones.........bah The Danes had high cheek bones, the Nords were the first Europeans to land anywhere near N. America, but you don't see her claiming she's descended from Vikings.
At the time of the first settlers, if a woman was taken by the locals, there is no way that bloodline would have made it into modern bloodlines. Up to and through the earliest of the 1900's, a woman taken and used by Indians was castigated. There is no way her bloodlines extend "multiple" generations that far back. Once a white woman become property of any Indians, they were shunned and social outcasts.
You know this to be a fact, but I suppose you're going to double down on ignorant, aren't you?

Wow, that's a Hell of a lot of words to say exactly nothing, isn't it?

Here's the deal, sj...Senator Warren's DNA test showed American Indian ancestry somewhere within 6-10 generations back. That's a fact.

Most sociologists consider a generation to be roughly 25 years. That's also a fact, for which I even provided you with a link.

A generation has nothing to do with anyone's lifespan; it has to do with how old a group of people are, on average, when they have children. My maternal grandfather was eight months shy of his fiftieth birthday when I was born...which made three generations of that branch of my family living at the same time.

So the first couple of sentences in that post of yours are totally irrelevant to the generation question, and the remainder just more redundant insults of Warren that have nothing to do with anything I wrote.

[Peter1469]

Wow, that's a Hell of a lot of words to say exactly nothing, isn't it?

Here's the deal, sj...Senator Warren's DNA test showed American Indian ancestry somewhere within 6-10 generations back. That's a fact.

Most sociologists consider a generation to be roughly 25 years. That's also a fact, for which I even provided you with a link.

A generation has nothing to do with anyone's lifespan; it has to do with how old a group of people are, on average, when they have children. My maternal grandfather was eight months shy of his fiftieth birthday when I was born...which made three generations of that branch of my family living at the same time.

So the first couple of sentences in that post of yours are totally irrelevant to the generation question, and the remainder just more redundant insults of Warren that have nothing to do with anything I wrote.

Native Europeans have more Native American blood in them that Warrens (at the lower end of the estimate).

[Standing Wolf]

Native Europeans have more Native American blood in them that Warrens (at the lower end of the estimate).

How is that pertinent to stjames' claim that 6-10 generations represented "300 to 500 years" and my refutation of that claim?

[Peter1469]

How is that pertinent to stjames' claim that 6-10 generations represented "300 to 500 years" and my refutation of that claim?

Nothing whatsoever. My statements stand on their own merit.

[stjames1_53]

Wow, that's a Hell of a lot of words to say exactly nothing, isn't it?

Here's the deal, sj...Senator Warren's DNA test showed American Indian ancestry somewhere within 6-10 generations back. That's a fact.

Most sociologists consider a generation to be roughly 25 years. That's also a fact, for which I even provided you with a link.

A generation has nothing to do with anyone's lifespan; it has to do with how old a group of people are, on average, when they have children. My maternal grandfather was eight months shy of his fiftieth birthday when I was born...which made three generations of that branch of my family living at the same time.

So the first couple of sentences in that post of yours are totally irrelevant to the generation question, and the remainder just more redundant insults of Warren that have nothing to do with anything I wrote.

it does when you make a false claim. Generations are marked by time. It is MOST relevant. Fact of the matter is that you cannot refute the claim
You've not offered up anything to support your claim. You probably have more Indian in your than does she.
The results of her test demonstrates that if she were to have any Indian in her blood, it was more than likely to be Indian from Central or South America, not Cherokee.
But I suppose you're going to fall back on the BS claim of her high cheek bones.
You have yet to prove she is Cherokee, or maybe she should

[stjames1_53]

How is that pertinent to stjames' claim that 6-10 generations represented "300 to 500 years" and my refutation of that claim?

Ok, chum, show me your numbers