User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Like we didnt already have a voting problem

  1. #1
    Points: 42,134, Level: 50
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 1,416
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    22616
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    6,707
    Points
    42,134
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    6,819
    Thanked 4,581x in 2,999 Posts
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Like we didnt already have a voting problem

    We are now moving into new territory. We already had a flawed voting system. Now it will be so bad that people may as well not even vote. What is the point?

    A court ruling just changed how we pick our president

    See more at the link https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ele...k-our-n1044961

    Excerpt:

    A federal appeals court ruled late Tuesday that presidential electors who cast the actual ballots for president and vice president are free to vote as they wish and cannot be required to follow the results of the popular vote in their states.The decision could give a single elector the power to decide the outcome of a presidential election if the popular vote results in an apparent Electoral College tie.

    "This issue could be a ticking time bomb in our divided politics. It's not hard to imagine how a single faithless elector, voting differently than his or her state did, could swing a close presidential election," said Mark Murray, NBC News senior political editor.

    It hasn't been much of an issue in American political history because when an elector refuses to follow the results of a state's popular vote, the state simply throws the ballot away. But Tuesday's ruling says states cannot do that.
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  2. #2
    Points: 38,841, Level: 48
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,309
    Overall activity: 53.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    157170
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    12,876
    Points
    38,841
    Level
    48
    Thanks Given
    6,016
    Thanked 9,803x in 6,075 Posts
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Just AnotherPerson View Post
    We are now moving into new territory. We already had a flawed voting system. Now it will be so bad that people may as well not even vote. What is the point?

    A court ruling just changed how we pick our president

    See more at the link https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ele...k-our-n1044961
    It only affects states in the 10th Circuit, and it will likely be appealed to SCOTUS.
    I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.
    ~Leonardo da Vinci

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 548,776, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    430553
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    163,910
    Points
    548,776
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    96,783
    Thanked 81,533x in 54,965 Posts
    Mentioned
    2249 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Constitution and federal statute are silent on pledging. Some states have laws covering it. So it isn't a Constitutional issue. Interestingly Wiki says there have been 167 instances of faithless electors. But only one election was effected by this.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  4. #4
    Points: 42,134, Level: 50
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 1,416
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    22616
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    6,707
    Points
    42,134
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    6,819
    Thanked 4,581x in 2,999 Posts
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    The Constitution and federal statute are silent on pledging. Some states have laws covering it. So it isn't a Constitutional issue. Interestingly Wiki says there have been 167 instances of faithless electors. But only one election was effected by this.
    It is a real issue. Why vote if our votes wont even be taken into consideration? Might as well scrap it altogether and just get the electors together. Are we slowly going full authoritarian? Soon we will not be a democratic republic anymore, well we already aren't if you think about it. The people are not the ones being represented anymore. The only ones with representation are the 1%.
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  5. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 548,776, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    430553
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    163,910
    Points
    548,776
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    96,783
    Thanked 81,533x in 54,965 Posts
    Mentioned
    2249 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Just AnotherPerson View Post
    It is a real issue. Why vote if our votes wont even be taken into consideration? Might as well scrap it altogether and just get the electors together. Are we slowly going full authoritarian? Soon we will not be a democratic republic anymore, well we already aren't if you think about it. The people are not the ones being represented anymore. The only ones with representation are the 1%.
    I get your point. That is why I am against the national popular vote compact.

    That is absolutely crazy. State A could vote 99% for candidate A, but if the national vote goes for candidate B, State A's votes go for candidate B.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  6. #6
    Points: 42,134, Level: 50
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 1,416
    Overall activity: 82.0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Just AnotherPerson's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    22616
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Milky Way Galaxy
    Posts
    6,707
    Points
    42,134
    Level
    50
    Thanks Given
    6,819
    Thanked 4,581x in 2,999 Posts
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I get your point. That is why I am against the national popular vote compact.

    That is absolutely crazy. State A could vote 99% for candidate A, but if the national vote goes for candidate B, State A's votes go for candidate B.
    That IS crazy. I hadn't heard that one. That really is just as bad as the OP. I am all for every single vote being counted and scrapping the electoral college but I am not down for that link you just presented. That is just wrong.
    We are all brothers and sisters in humanity. We are all made from the same dust of stars. We cannot be separated because all life is interconnected.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Just AnotherPerson For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (08-22-2019)

  8. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 548,776, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 63.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    430553
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    163,910
    Points
    548,776
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    96,783
    Thanked 81,533x in 54,965 Posts
    Mentioned
    2249 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Just AnotherPerson View Post
    That IS crazy. I hadn't heard that one. That really is just as bad as the OP. I am all for every single vote being counted and scrapping the electoral college but I am not down for that link you just presented. That is just wrong.
    I have no doubt that this will be shot down by the courts.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    FindersKeepers (08-22-2019)

  10. #8
    Points: 38,841, Level: 48
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 1,309
    Overall activity: 53.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    157170
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    12,876
    Points
    38,841
    Level
    48
    Thanks Given
    6,016
    Thanked 9,803x in 6,075 Posts
    Mentioned
    149 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I get your point. That is why I am against the national popular vote compact.

    That is absolutely crazy. State A could vote 99% for candidate A, but if the national vote goes for candidate B, State A's votes go for candidate B.
    I agree that the National Popular Vote is a dangerous scenario. If the libs ever push it through, I think SCOTUS will throw it out, however.
    I have from an early age abjured the use of meat, and the time will come when men such as I will look upon the murder of animals as they now look upon the murder of men.
    ~Leonardo da Vinci

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to FindersKeepers For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (08-22-2019)

  12. #9

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 87,054, Level: 71
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 196
    Overall activity: 54.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    170812
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    20,988
    Points
    87,054
    Level
    71
    Thanks Given
    7,127
    Thanked 16,074x in 9,232 Posts
    Mentioned
    555 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This isn't new. It's always been that way. From what I understand, it's never gone against the vote of the state citizens, but legally it could.
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO