User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Escorts deploy without USS Harry Truman as East Coast carrier shortage persists

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 528,766, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    427017
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    158,878
    Points
    528,766
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    93,378
    Thanked 77,994x in 52,663 Posts
    Mentioned
    2220 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Escorts deploy without USS Harry Truman as East Coast carrier shortage persists

    Escorts deploy without USS Harry Truman as East Coast carrier shortage persists

    This has not happened since 2006. A few times since escorts left prior to the carrier because it was under maintenance, but the carrier joined its group later.

    Surface escorts from the Harry S. Truman Carrier Strike Group left their homeports today to kick off an overseas deployment.

    Aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman (CVN-75) did not.


    After the carrier was sidelined at the end of August with a malfunction in the ship’s electrical distribution system, engineers continue to assess the problem. “The aircraft carrier’s repairs are progressing, and all efforts are being made to deploy the carrier and air wing as soon as possible,” according to a Navy statement to USNI News.


    The timeline for diagnosing the problem and fixing it remains unclear.


    In the meantime, the surface ships in the strike group are forming their own surface action group and deploying with neither the carrier nor the air wing.


    Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyers USS Lassen (DDG-82) and USS Farragut (DDG-99) departed Mayport, Fla., today, and will be joined by Norfolk-based USS Forrest Sherman (DDG-98) and Ticonderoga-class guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy (CG-60) in the coming days.


    The SAG will be led by the Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 28 and her staff, along with elements of the carrier strike group staff. The SAG staff brought in about 15 additional personnel to make up for capabilities typically found on the carrier, particularly in the areas of maintenance and technical support, U.S. 2nd Fleet Commander Vice Adm. Andrew Lewis told USNI News today in a telephone interview.


    The SAG will also take with it a detachment of MH-60R helicopters from Helicopter Maritime Squadron (HSM) 72 out of Naval Air Station Jacksonville, Fla.
    Read the rest of the article at the link.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  2. #2
    Points: 103,462, Level: 78
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 1,788
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Crepitus's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    1254064
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Wichita, KS
    Posts
    36,685
    Points
    103,462
    Level
    78
    Thanks Given
    16,243
    Thanked 12,289x in 8,929 Posts
    Mentioned
    433 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Escorts deploy without USS Harry Truman as East Coast carrier shortage persists

    This has not happened since 2006. A few times since escorts left prior to the carrier because it was under maintenance, but the carrier joined its group later.



    Read the rest of the article at the link.
    I've been reading here lately that there is a growing opinion that carriers are obsolete. That they are too vulnerable to modern missiles and such. I have to admit that I don't know enough about their defenses, so I was wondering your opinion Peter.
    Don't taze me Bro!!

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 528,766, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    427017
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    158,878
    Points
    528,766
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    93,378
    Thanked 77,994x in 52,663 Posts
    Mentioned
    2220 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Crepitus View Post
    I've been reading here lately that there is a growing opinion that carriers are obsolete. That they are too vulnerable to modern missiles and such. I have to admit that I don't know enough about their defenses, so I was wondering your opinion Peter.
    I have read both sides of the debate and do not believe that carriers are obsolete. Especially with lasers entering the fleet. The big issue is hypersonic cruise missiles.

    But it is a very expensive gamble. 1 sunk carrier will take over 6000 sailors (slightly less with the Ford class) and $4.5B (for the Nimitz class) to the bottom of the ocean.

    Here is a short video from the Under Sec Def.

    Here is an article from the National Interest that discusses the Chinese "carrier killer" v. a US Navy aircraft carrier. The author says the US should stop thinking its needs to keep its carriers far from danger and accept the inherent risk in any war.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Crepitus (09-14-2019)

  5. #4

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 78,098, Level: 68
    Level completed: 16%, Points required for next Level: 1,952
    Overall activity: 51.0%
    Achievements:
    Recommendation Second ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassYour first GroupVeteran
    DGUtley's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    169585
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Northeast Ohio
    Posts
    19,038
    Points
    78,098
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    6,533
    Thanked 14,847x in 8,514 Posts
    Mentioned
    504 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What will provide this battle group air cover?

    Is the supersonic missile theory argle bargle?
    Any time you give a man something he doesn't earn, you cheapen him. Our kids earn what they get, and that includes respect. -- Woody Hayes​

  6. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 528,766, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    427017
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    158,878
    Points
    528,766
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    93,378
    Thanked 77,994x in 52,663 Posts
    Mentioned
    2220 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DGUtley View Post
    What will provide this battle group air cover?

    Is the supersonic missile theory argle bargle?
    Hypersonic.

    Both China and Russia claim to have them. The DIA says they do. The questions become how many and how good are they. We are developing them.

    The Surface Attack Group (not a carrier attack group without the carrier) will have helicopters on the destroyers. I am not sure if the cruisers would support a helicopter, but their have very good anti-air capabilities. But you are correct, there will be no carrier air group on this deployment.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    Please visit my blog http://thepoliticalforums.com/blogs/peter/
    (If a post link does not work, see the archives- it should work there.)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Critical Acclaim
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO