This week Merriam-Webster added a “non-binary” definition of “they” to the dictionary to cater to individuals who identify as neither male nor female. Also this week, National Review’s Douglas Murray went on BBC Radio 4 to promote his new book The Madness of Crowds. During the interview, Douglas said “I don’t think there is any such thing as non-binary. And I think a lot of people know that too.”
The journalist Afua Hirsch disagreed. She said that Douglas’s criticism of the pop singer Sam Smith, for his recent announcement that he is non-binary and now prefers “they/them” pronouns, was akin to bullying. Smith is simply “somebody who is making an expression of his identity,” Hirsch said.....snip~
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...nary-nonsense/
Merriam-Webster Redefines ‘They’ to Include a Non-Binary …
https://www.christianheadlines.com/contributors/michael-foust/merriam-webster...
2 days ago · The dictionary that traces its roots to 19th-century author and lexicographer Noah Webster now says “they” can refer to one person – instead of only multiple people, as previously defined. Merriam-Webster said this week an additional definition had been added to the word “they” in reference to non-binary …
This is some ridiculous BS. They, them and theirs are pronouns. Meaning Plural. Not singular. These people that believe they are non binary are mental cases. There is a simple solution.
Directions for the lefties. Take off Under-garments. Then most importantly. Look Down at your anatomy shouldn't be that difficult for even your kind to figure out.