User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Science Around Male Brains vs. Female Brains

  1. #1
    Points: 463,236, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 73.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    397540
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    150,187
    Points
    463,236
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    15,574
    Thanked 45,115x in 33,180 Posts
    Mentioned
    1724 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    The Science Around Male Brains vs. Female Brains

    Stossel presents the arguments of Professor Gina Rippon, who argues there's no significant biological/neurological difference between males and female brains, and evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischman who says there's overwhelming evidence of biological differences.

    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  2. #2
    Points: 49,851, Level: 54
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 799
    Overall activity: 9.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    30757
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    10,543
    Points
    49,851
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    2,077
    Thanked 3,647x in 2,660 Posts
    Mentioned
    119 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Dem Party has done more to harm this country the last 4 years than Russia. They blame Trump for their fit throwing actions. That is total BS. Shameful.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to texan For This Useful Post:

    Lummy (10-15-2019)

  4. #3

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 121,139, Level: 84
    Level completed: 47%, Points required for next Level: 1,711
    Overall activity: 8.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassCreated Album picturesYour first GroupRecommendation First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Adelaide's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    338942
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    N. Pole and VA
    Posts
    26,498
    Points
    121,139
    Level
    84
    Thanks Given
    3,539
    Thanked 16,066x in 10,252 Posts
    Mentioned
    1571 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    So, Rippon sort of said something that made me wonder about her. When asked why a third of female babies play with tractor parts, rather than two-thirds like the male babies, she said that a larger sample size would potentially explain it. That's actually not the case unless the study she cited has a very small sample group or a very biased sample group ("biased" as in the stats term). If that's the case, and the sample is small or biased, it wouldn't be considered valid/reliable for her purposes and it would likely be reflected in the statistical analysis. Since there is no link to the study and I do not own the book, I guess I cannot figure out the sample size and whether the central limit theorem is relevant.

    At any rate, both are right and both are wrong, but no one can really say conclusively with 100% confidence. Likely, hormones and neurotransmitters may be the greatest biological influence (and genetics) and then socialization sort of seals the deal on a lot of behaviors and attitudes. Hormones may explain why male students would be more likely to show an interest in an aggressive sport than a female, for example.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Adelaide For This Useful Post:

    Chris (10-15-2019)

  6. #4
    Points: 53,376, Level: 56
    Level completed: 44%, Points required for next Level: 1,074
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    8107
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    24,997
    Points
    53,376
    Level
    56
    Thanks Given
    42,278
    Thanked 8,111x in 6,520 Posts
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Adelaide View Post
    So, Rippon sort of said something that made me wonder about her. When asked why a third of female babies play with tractor parts, rather than two-thirds like the male babies, she said that a larger sample size would potentially explain it. That's actually not the case unless the study she cited has a very small sample group or a very biased sample group ("biased" as in the stats term). If that's the case, and the sample is small or biased, it wouldn't be considered valid/reliable for her purposes and it would likely be reflected in the statistical analysis. Since there is no link to the study and I do not own the book, I guess I cannot figure out the sample size and whether the central limit theorem is relevant.

    At any rate, both are right and both are wrong, but no one can really say conclusively with 100% confidence. Likely, hormones and neurotransmitters may be the greatest biological influence (and genetics) and then socialization sort of seals the deal on a lot of behaviors and attitudes. Hormones may explain why male students would be more likely to show an interest in an aggressive sport than a female, for example.
    I have doubts about tractor parts. I have doubts any kid knows what tractor parts are.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our freedom and our society and our morals.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO