User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: The Science Around Male Brains vs. Female Brains

  1. #1
    Points: 482,825, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.7%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    400571
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    155,304
    Points
    482,825
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    16,835
    Thanked 48,146x in 35,243 Posts
    Mentioned
    1758 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    The Science Around Male Brains vs. Female Brains

    Stossel presents the arguments of Professor Gina Rippon, who argues there's no significant biological/neurological difference between males and female brains, and evolutionary psychologist Diana Fleischman who says there's overwhelming evidence of biological differences.

    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  2. #2
    Points: 52,961, Level: 56
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 1,489
    Overall activity: 5.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    31428
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    11,322
    Points
    52,961
    Level
    56
    Thanks Given
    2,595
    Thanked 4,318x in 3,081 Posts
    Mentioned
    121 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Dem Party has done more to harm this country the last 4 years than Russia. They blame Trump for their fit throwing actions. That is total BS. Shameful.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to texan For This Useful Post:

    Lummy (10-15-2019)

  4. #3

    tPF Moderator
    Points: 125,935, Level: 85
    Level completed: 97%, Points required for next Level: 115
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger First ClassCreated Album picturesYour first GroupRecommendation First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Adelaide's Avatar tPF Moderator
    Karma
    339343
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    N. Pole and VA
    Posts
    27,353
    Points
    125,935
    Level
    85
    Thanks Given
    3,647
    Thanked 16,467x in 10,521 Posts
    Mentioned
    1606 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)
    So, Rippon sort of said something that made me wonder about her. When asked why a third of female babies play with tractor parts, rather than two-thirds like the male babies, she said that a larger sample size would potentially explain it. That's actually not the case unless the study she cited has a very small sample group or a very biased sample group ("biased" as in the stats term). If that's the case, and the sample is small or biased, it wouldn't be considered valid/reliable for her purposes and it would likely be reflected in the statistical analysis. Since there is no link to the study and I do not own the book, I guess I cannot figure out the sample size and whether the central limit theorem is relevant.

    At any rate, both are right and both are wrong, but no one can really say conclusively with 100% confidence. Likely, hormones and neurotransmitters may be the greatest biological influence (and genetics) and then socialization sort of seals the deal on a lot of behaviors and attitudes. Hormones may explain why male students would be more likely to show an interest in an aggressive sport than a female, for example.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Adelaide For This Useful Post:

    Chris (10-15-2019)

  6. #4
    Points: 58,186, Level: 58
    Level completed: 92%, Points required for next Level: 164
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    1 year registeredTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsSocial
    Captdon's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    8778
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    27,095
    Points
    58,186
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    45,996
    Thanked 8,782x in 7,065 Posts
    Mentioned
    131 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Adelaide View Post
    So, Rippon sort of said something that made me wonder about her. When asked why a third of female babies play with tractor parts, rather than two-thirds like the male babies, she said that a larger sample size would potentially explain it. That's actually not the case unless the study she cited has a very small sample group or a very biased sample group ("biased" as in the stats term). If that's the case, and the sample is small or biased, it wouldn't be considered valid/reliable for her purposes and it would likely be reflected in the statistical analysis. Since there is no link to the study and I do not own the book, I guess I cannot figure out the sample size and whether the central limit theorem is relevant.

    At any rate, both are right and both are wrong, but no one can really say conclusively with 100% confidence. Likely, hormones and neurotransmitters may be the greatest biological influence (and genetics) and then socialization sort of seals the deal on a lot of behaviors and attitudes. Hormones may explain why male students would be more likely to show an interest in an aggressive sport than a female, for example.
    I have doubts about tractor parts. I have doubts any kid knows what tractor parts are.
    Liberals are a clear and present danger to our freedom and our society and our morals.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO