Pelosi Blinked

[Tahuyaman]

There are ellipses in the transcript (if i remember correctly) that Vindman says are in place of words that change things.

I can go look it up.

Morrison testified that Vindman was wrong. Morrison said the transcript was both accurate and complete. Of course some in the liberal, media are reporting the exact opposite. They count on people being too lazy to verify that by checking other sources.

[silvereyes]

If you have an argument to make, make it. If you are unable to make it do the honorable thing. Fade away.

Did you even read it?

[stjames1_53]

Did you even read it?

yep. Where's the mention of quid pro quo?

[MisterVeritis]

Did you even read it?

Why would I do so? If the author comes here and make his case I am open to it.

If you have a case to make you make it.

[silvereyes]

Why would I do so? If the author comes here and make his case I am open to it.

If you have a case to make you make it.

You really are something else. All i did was show what Vindman is testifying to. Period.

[MisterVeritis]

You really are something else. All i did was show what Vindman is testifying to. Period.

A link is not an argument. You failed to make an argument.

I thought a friend should tell you.

[silvereyes]

Sigh....

There are ellipses in the transcript (if i remember correctly) that Vindman says are in place of words that change things.

I can go look it up.

Opinion:

Why bother? Vindman was one individual in a group detailed to listen, take notes, and create the phone call memorandum. The memo is a consensus document. Vindman was overruled, apparently. Vindman, a spy, has his opinion. But Vindman, a leaker, does not make foreign policy. The President does.

Why bother? Vindman was one individual in a group detailed to listen, take notes, and create the phone call memorandum. The memo is a consensus document. Vindman was overruled, apparently. Vindman, a spy, has his opinion. But Vindman, a leaker, does not make foreign policy. The President does.





Pay attention. Vindman is irrelevant, petty, narcissistic, a spy, and a leaker. He needs to be investigated by the FBI. He appears to be the leaker who divulged classified, restricted information to a CIA plant and the Democrat party.

My showing what Vindman says:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...ipt/index.html

I was simply linking what i had said:

A link is not an argument. You failed to make an argument.

I thought a friend should tell you.

[MisterVeritis]

Sigh....
Opinion:
My showing what Vindman says:
I was simply linking what i had said:

A link is not an argument.

You didn't say anything.

[Tahuyaman]

You really are something else. All i did was show what Vindman is testifying to. Period.

That’s something everyone already knew. His testimony was shot down by another credible witness

[FindersKeepers]

Im just stating things as they are though. MMC did it as well...but it slid by.

And, for the reasons I stated. It's human nature to be kind to those who are kind to you -- and less kind to those who are less kind to you.

The reason I originally called Safety out on whataboutism is because he does it consistently and then he whines when others do it. Honestly, I think he does it more than any poster here. Then he went and made the bogus claim that no poster on the forum used the term prior to Trump being elected, and, of course, he was wrong -- he's often wrong -- but he never admits it. It's a weakness of his. A character flaw.

I actually think whataboutism has its place, and I've said so before, but Safety seeks to derail virtually any thread he posts on by using it in a bogus fashion. At any rate -- that's how I see it.