I see. Fake is just an opinion.
So, in your opinion then, this was a "real" charity. If it was a real one, would the judge have ordered Trump to pay an additional $2 million, because the charities never received any funds from the foundation?
Would Trump have settled? Maybe. But less likely. Still, you got me on a technicality. I mistakenly thought you were referring to more important details like this one from the article:
"misusing" It's a polite way to say he "stole".
And?
And you think he didn't do anything wrong?
I never once used the word "guilty"
When you resort to legal technicalities instead of judging Trump's moral character, it betrays your own moral character.
Trump, a purported billionaire, stole money from charity. Let me say that again:
A Billionaire stole from charity.
That might not be evil. But he is obviously sick and damaging to society because of his sickness.
Did I speak as if it had happened? Nope. Here is what I said...
If he doesn't win in 2020 it seems likely he will soon face indictment for:
3) Tax Evasion
4) Insurance Fraud
Currently he under investigation for committing 5) perjury in his written responses to the Mueller investigation.
I must admit. This is not fair for republicans. They are forced to defend this guy who doesn't adhere to any norms, lies continuously, and has a corruption all around him.
It is too easy for non-republicans to appear way smarter because of it.
People can read this response and judge for themselves who is not arguing from facts.