User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 47

Thread: Has anyone changed his (or her) mind?

  1. #21
    Points: 12,970, Level: 27
    Level completed: 36%, Points required for next Level: 580
    Overall activity: 19.0%
    Achievements:
    10000 Experience Points1 year registered
    Retirednsmilin308's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    2625
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    3,179
    Points
    12,970
    Level
    27
    Thanks Given
    3,050
    Thanked 2,618x in 1,627 Posts
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Hence, IMHO they need a much more forceful message that they can't ignore.

    ...starting at one end of the capitol building and driving them all out at bayonet point?

    I am good with that.
    NONE ARE HELPLESS...There are only those WEAK ENOUGH to believe they are...and those STRONG ENOUGH to revel in the knowledge they are not.

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Retirednsmilin308 For This Useful Post:

    Collateral Damage (11-21-2019),Dr. Who (11-21-2019),Peter1469 (11-23-2019)

  3. #22
    Points: 243,584, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    275018
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    108,037
    Points
    243,584
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,057
    Thanked 44,006x in 32,713 Posts
    Mentioned
    480 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mister D View Post
    My impression is that a lot of people are bored or turned off by this political theater. I doubt there are many people who have been moved one way or the other by it.
    If anything this is turning people away from the Democrats and helping Trump.



    Apparently theres no credible third party alternative who can capitalize on this political mess.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tahuyaman For This Useful Post:

    Collateral Damage (11-21-2019)

  5. #23
    Points: 31,417, Level: 43
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,033
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    pjohns's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12087
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,034
    Points
    31,417
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    8,173
    Thanked 1,781x in 1,257 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    What would be fantastic (in every sense of the word) is if either no one went to the polls or everyone went and spoiled their ballots to suggest that until the terrible two parties can run someone worth the time and effort of their consideration, that the public will not play their stupid games. Better still, until they open up the playing field to third parties, they can take a hike.
    It would appear that the antecedent of "they" (in the final sentence) is "the terrible two parties."

    But just how is it that these two parties--sometimes accused of having a "duopoly" within the system--are actually guilty of keeping others out?

    Many do not wish to vote for a third-party candidate, for fear of "wasting" their respective votes. And, in a way, that is true: They will not be voting to help elect the preferable major candidate, from their perspective.

    If one votes primarily to send a message, then that is not so important. But if one votes primarily to elect the candidate that one prefers--even if it a "lesser of two evils" thing--then it is really all that matters.

    Anyway, I just cannot see how the two major parties are (somehow) conspiring to keep out anyone else.

  6. #24
    Points: 31,417, Level: 43
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,033
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    pjohns's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12087
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,034
    Points
    31,417
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    8,173
    Thanked 1,781x in 1,257 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Retirednsmilin308 View Post
    My dreams are much simpler.

    I just wish they would answer the mail we send them with an actual thought out answer.
    Instead of some, "We are aware...." BS copy/paste.
    ...but most do not even send out those. They just ignore us and our letters.

    That tells me how much they think of us.
    In other words, it is just boilerplate--about as personal and thoughtful as the fundraising letters that I frequently receive.

  7. #25
    Points: 483,889, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 96.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    400696
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    155,484
    Points
    483,889
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    16,878
    Thanked 48,271x in 35,323 Posts
    Mentioned
    1759 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pjohns View Post
    It would appear that the antecedent of "they" (in the final sentence) is "the terrible two parties."

    But just how is it that these two parties--sometimes accused of having a "duopoly" within the system--are actually guilty of keeping others out?

    Many do not wish to vote for a third-party candidate, for fear of "wasting" their respective votes. And, in a way, that is true: They will not be voting to help elect the preferable major candidate, from their perspective.

    If one votes primarily to send a message, then that is not so important. But if one votes primarily to elect the candidate that one prefers--even if it a "lesser of two evils" thing--then it is really all that matters.

    Anyway, I just cannot see how the two major parties are (somehow) conspiring to keep out anyone else.

    They do conspire to keep third parties out of debates. The Libertarian and Green Parties sued over it but lost in court. Otherwise, not. It's like the market, where people vote with dollars and create monopoly-like corporations
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Collateral Damage (11-21-2019)

  9. #26
    Points: 133,839, Level: 88
    Level completed: 35%, Points required for next Level: 2,211
    Overall activity: 24.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Dr. Who's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    863237
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Gallifrey
    Posts
    54,520
    Points
    133,839
    Level
    88
    Thanks Given
    5,949
    Thanked 5,499x in 3,791 Posts
    Mentioned
    115 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pjohns View Post
    It would appear that the antecedent of "they" (in the final sentence) is "the terrible two parties."

    But just how is it that these two parties--sometimes accused of having a "duopoly" within the system--are actually guilty of keeping others out?

    Many do not wish to vote for a third-party candidate, for fear of "wasting" their respective votes. And, in a way, that is true: They will not be voting to help elect the preferable major candidate, from their perspective.

    If one votes primarily to send a message, then that is not so important. But if one votes primarily to elect the candidate that one prefers--even if it a "lesser of two evils" thing--then it is really all that matters.

    Anyway, I just cannot see how the two major parties are (somehow) conspiring to keep out anyone else.
    Well, there is the Commission on Presidential Debates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commis...ential_Debates
    "The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
    Mahatma Gandhi

  10. #27
    Points: 31,417, Level: 43
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,033
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    pjohns's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12087
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,034
    Points
    31,417
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    8,173
    Thanked 1,781x in 1,257 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    They do conspire to keep third parties out of debates. The Libertarian and Green Parties sued over it but lost in court. Otherwise, not. It's like the market, where people vote with dollars and create monopoly-like corporations
    Does anyone really believe that "debates" (which are not really debates at all, in any classical sense of the word; but merely question-and-answer sessions) actually determine the voting preferences of the public?

    Note: Wikipedia notes that "in 2000, the CPD established a rule that for a candidate to be included in the national debates he or she must garner at least 15% support across five national polls."

    That does not really strike me as being unreasonable. (Unless, of course, one believes that we should actively try to gin up support for a third-party candidate.)
    Last edited by pjohns; 11-21-2019 at 04:28 PM.

  11. #28
    Points: 31,417, Level: 43
    Level completed: 27%, Points required for next Level: 1,033
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocialVeteran25000 Experience Points
    pjohns's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    12087
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    4,034
    Points
    31,417
    Level
    43
    Thanks Given
    8,173
    Thanked 1,781x in 1,257 Posts
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Who View Post
    Well, there is the Commission on Presidential Debates: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commis...ential_Debates
    Please see post #27 in this thread.

  12. #29
    Points: 483,889, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 96.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    400696
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    155,484
    Points
    483,889
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    16,878
    Thanked 48,271x in 35,323 Posts
    Mentioned
    1759 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pjohns View Post
    Does anyone really believe that "debates" (which are not really debates at all, in any classical sense of the word; but merely question-and-answer sessions) actually determine the voting preferences of the public?

    Note: Wikipedia notes that "in 2000, the CPD established a rule that for a candidate to be included in the national debates he or she must garner at least 15% support across five national polls."

    That does not really strike me as being unreasonable. (Unless, of course, one believes that we should actively try to gin up support for a third-party candidate.)

    Getting alternative views out in debates would likely not affect an immediate election but it would get other ideas out there.
    Edmund Burke: "In vain you tell me that Artificial Government is good, but that I fall out only with the Abuse. The Thing! the Thing itself is the Abuse!"

  13. #30
    Points: 5,482, Level: 17
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 268
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    5000 Experience PointsVeteran
    CaveDog's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    3138
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    New Hampster
    Posts
    349
    Points
    5,482
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    80
    Thanked 288x in 171 Posts
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Voting Democrat has long been out of the question for me. The only decision affected is that of voting Republican (I.e. voting directly against a particular Dem) or voting third party in order to encourage alternatives. In recent years Dems have become so radical that I tend to vote Republican as a rule so you could say my mind is changed.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO