User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: Have Democrats forgotten President Obama's quid pro quo trade with Iran?

  1. #11
    Points: 45,458, Level: 52
    Level completed: 12%, Points required for next Level: 1,592
    Overall activity: 0%
    Achievements:
    Social25000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Agent Zero's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    19619
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    8,003
    Points
    45,458
    Level
    52
    Thanks Given
    2,498
    Thanked 1,784x in 1,405 Posts
    Mentioned
    333 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Evidently Snopes just like leftists just don't understand what Quid Pro Quo is.


    In January 2016, the Obama administration successfully negotiated the release of four Americans who had been imprisoned in Iran in exchange for the release of seven Iranians who had been imprisoned in the United States.....snip~




    Quid Pro Quo Meaning and Usage | Grammarly Blog

    https://www.grammarly.com/blog/quid-pro-quo
    Quid pro quo is a Latin phrase that literally means “something for something,” or “this for that.” We use the phrase to signify an exchange of goods, services, favors, or any other kind of value. When we’re talking about multiple exchanges, we can say quid pro quos . Originally,...



    Let Snopes know.....ALL exchanges are quid pro quo. This way they cant just deny facts.
    The problem here isn't the quid pro quo. That's common in political dealings and primarily why the phrase isn't being used in this case anymore.

    The issue is bribery - you don't withhold congressionally funded military assistance in order to find dirt on a political opponent.
    How crazy alt righties got pwnd by a conervative web site:
    https://www.forbes.com/sites/berlins.../#3b7ecb78e9b5
    il·lib·er·al
    i(l)ˈlib(ə)rəladjective1.opposed to liberal principles; restricting freedom of thought or behavior
    "illiberal and anti-democratic policies
    • synonyms: intolerant, narrow-minded, unenlightened, conservative, reactionary;


  2. #12

    Original Ranter
    Points: 236,327, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    50314
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    60,573
    Points
    236,327
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    27,349
    Thanked 19,309x in 14,602 Posts
    Mentioned
    133 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Zero View Post
    The problem here isn't the quid pro quo. That's common in political dealings and primarily why the phrase isn't being used in this case anymore.

    The issue is bribery - you don't withhold congressionally funded military assistance in order to find dirt on a political opponent.
    The issue is Bribery? None has been show in the Demos impeachment Inquiry. Plus the Lame Stream reported that the Demos had a focus group help them change the term Quid Pro Quo to Bribery.

    Yes QPQ is Common with all US Presidents. So its not different for Trump. Your Demos have lied to you.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO