The Great Climate Hoax

[Padme]

Sigh* ... The left: Blah, blah, blah

Climate change is a:

[stjames1_53]

My side? Ok.


Excuse use me if I dismiss you out of hand.


Hack.

He should return his copy of Aliniski's Rules............. He doesn't know how to make it work for him

[Tahuyaman]

He should return his copy of Aliniski's Rules............. He doesn't know how to make it work for him

He / she is just a hack.

[carolina73]

What does that have to do with deniers being caught pushing fraud again?

Oh I see. You're just trying to deflect from your side's sordid behavior.

"Deniers pushing fraud again"

It's your theory so you have to adequately prove it is true.

If you do not and people follow you then they are only doing it on faith or they can be just gullible.

When you with lies then you make it twice as difficult to sell the point. I am not saying you personally but the people you are taking on faith or you are gullible enough to believe.
We know they have rigged data. We know they claim to use carbon tests that are not accurate beyond about 10,000 years and just total trash at 50,000 years to claim carbon trapped in ice proves something. We know they mad two adjustments in the data for change to digital equipment and urbanization as if zero degrees is not zero degrees because it is digital. Those two changes added together accounts for most of the temperature change. We know they altered their argument to be "Climate Change" so that they could never be questioned. We know they have not been testing globally for much of the modern era they try to describe so there data is mostly Euro-centric starting only about 140 years ago.

140 years is just a blip of history.

Remember whet they promised you that all 17 intelligence agencies agreed it was Russia, The they had to admit their were only 16 since HHS is administration for the others. Then in Senate hearings Clapper had to admit under oath it was 3. No one mentioned it was the same 3 working with Christopher Steele, Fusion GPS...

But you still buy that also. That argument is not about temperature at any point. The climate always changes in one direction or another, so the question is about the impact of man.

And please do not say scientists to me because no one is hired as a scientist. Little girls in biology class that dissect a frog can call herself a scientist. The environment scientist label did not even exist until this global warming craze created it. We used to call them the safety manager.

[Padme]

Greta, Wuhan and 1919 - March 11, 2020 CDN Newsletter Readout

•Premiered 118 minutes ago

[Peter1469]

Yes, that's the fear your side was peddling. In contrast, almost all scientists were predicting global warming at that time. Only a few denier diehards were pushing cooling.

The denier Ice Age Cult has been peddling "Ice age any day now!" constantly for over 40 years running now. Their Holy Ice Age never arrives, but deniers still cling to their frigid faith. Most of them still believe that the HolyIceAge will arrive real soon now.

In contrast, the rational people have had a stunning record of success over those 40 years by consistently predicting warming. That's why they have such credibility. They've earned it through their consistent record of success.

Except most Warmist models are too high and don't reflect reality.

[texan]

This is not a joke. But again. In 1973 as a kid I was told that Galveston Island would be gone to rising sea levels causing erosion. They said by the year 2000. I was a bit freaked because that was a common vacation spot, fishing spot and home to my grand parents off and on depending on the job situation.

Same $#@! repackaged and sold over and over until they could get people scarred like oh I don’t know a virus.

[Peter1469]

This is not a joke. But again. In 1973 as a kid I was told that Galveston Island would be gone to rising sea levels causing erosion. They said by the year 2000. I was a bit freaked because that was a common vacation spot, fishing spot and home to my grand parents off and on depending on the job situation.

Same $#@! repackaged and sold over and over until they could get people scarred like oh I don’t know a virus.

Obama claims to be a Warmist, yet he bought ocean front property. Not a smart move if you really think it will soon be under water.

[stjames1_53]

This is not a joke. But again. In 1973 as a kid I was told that Galveston Island would be gone to rising sea levels causing erosion. They said by the year 2000. I was a bit freaked because that was a common vacation spot, fishing spot and home to my grand parents off and on depending on the job situation.

Same $#@! repackaged and sold over and over until they could get people scarred like oh I don’t know a virus.

Twofer

Growing up in LaPorte, we had 7 inside of city limit, lakes. I did a lot of fishing in those lakes, got some good bass and northeners and this is important, in one lake, Pine Lake, they used to catch sturgeon, the lake levels started falling. Two foot in one summer.
More than a foot the next summer until my secret bass spot was exposed and laid bare.
It fell for 7 years. Then it stopped for a year in every city-locked lake. Lake Michigan also fell similar levels along that some guideline.
Then poof, it start rising again. about the same loss per gain. It rose for 7 years. Stayed that way for 7 years, then started to fall again.
We are talking about the very nature of nature itself and saying money will stop the natural function of the planet.
Old man Murphy, who had a house on the lake was affected on the rise. He was losing front yard by the week.
His take away, which I recall to this day, "When ya live by water, ya live by water. It changes like a woman." That rule works everywhere. If it didn't Florida would be under water, and NYC would be the new Venice
This planet changes and it changes everything, constantly.
We are not immortal beings. This planet will outlive us, all of us after we are all gone.
Science? Really???? Men of science are not required to have a soul, they have science. That's not a good thing.

[Tahuyaman]

Greta, Wuhan and 1919 - March 11, 2020 CDN Newsletter Readout

•Premiered 118 minutes ago

Ignore her.