Occam's Razor means nothing except that you went to see the movie $#@!tails. It is not a logical argument. It is a quip.
Carbon dating
https://www.allaboutarchaeology.org/...curate-faq.htm
The common accepted usefulness is longer than this article suggests with most saying about 10,000 years.
At 60,000 years it would be like me claiming I was 20 +/- 100 years by the test.
Sorry, but I have two Engineering degrees before I got my MBA. I understand the science and probability far more than you do. You are just repeating what you were told. I started in R&D and no one was called a scientist. I also checked NASA and no one is called scientist in the title. 97% of scientist say is a lie. It was a college project that even the professor told us that the information was used incorrectly and the data was selective.
Now your entire package of lies is premised on the fact that the climate has been getting warmer but you have never tied it to man. Pollution is bad. We all know that. When the earth is not warming then it is cooling. The climate always changes.