Diversity is NOT a strength.

[Reason10]

As for diversity being a strength, it's such a counter-intuitive proposition one's first reaction should be skepticism.

Are the destructive forces of nature a strength?

[Reason10]

But then it wouldn’t be diverse.

A culture is a rejection of diversity. Religion (and I mean ALL individual religions) impose a code of conformity that rejects diversity.

Mainstream American conservatism rejects the "diversity" of lawlessness, communism, socialism, Fascism, and all other unique forces of nature.

American liberalism (that small 34 percent of the country) rejects the "diversity" of alternative thought and ideology.

[Reason10]

Because all would have adopted American culture and behaviour and there would be no differences. Diversity is the differences which are seen as being equal.

Actually, diversity is the OPPOSITE of differences being seen as equal. Diversity is the tsunami flowing against peaceful human thought of organization. Diversity is powerful. Both sides of the political spectrum fight diversity tooth and nail.

Civilization is where opposites are FORCED to cooperate, learn to get along and act accordingly. And human civilization is the most UNNATURAL state of existence in the entire history of the world.
It is natural for us to be animals, preying on others, man raping women, women murdering their babies, destroying families, etc. THAT'S nature. That's DIVERSITY.

Civilization is our rejection of diversity, which means our rejection of nature itself.

(I'm still waiting for a few small minds--mostly on the left here--to grasp where this is going. So far, it's uphill.)

[Reason10]

Diversity means differences; differences in culture, religion, behaviour …

Actually, diversity is a force of nature. It is the uncontrollable force of nature. Culture, religion, human behavior, are all rejections of diversity and of nature itself.



Societies are founded on cohesion and around them are borders to separate those differences from others.

In other words, they reject diversity and their most basic NATURAL instincts. They conform to a uniquely human concept of the rule of law, the most unnatural and most un-diverse concept every announced on Earth.


If you remove those borders you get what you see across the west today, divided societies and chaos. Open borders is a project, an experiment arising out of Europe. It’s never been tried before and it’s a failure.

Pretty much, that's the case. Whether or not human society survives at all (and American society will be the one who writes that chapter since we are the most civilized land on the planet) will depend on how much we are willing to deny our most basic nature and control our most basic "diverse" urges.

Even the concept of locking your car or locking your house is a rejection of diversity. Wanting to keep what you have worked for flies against nature in all its forms.

[Reason10]

Exactly, diversity is needed for the survival of a people. But the identitarian diversity cheered by the left with their moral relativism is all about melting them all into one mass of men in a global world.

Actually, diversity is the enemy of human survival. It is the threat against the future existence of human beings on this third rock from the sun. Our entire longevity as a species on this planet rests on our ability to resist diversity and nature.

[Reason10]

You know you're wrong, right? My English, Irish, Scotch and German ancestors built this country into what it is now. That's a fact.

Freedom, the rule of law, and capitalism built this country. The nationality of the founders is almost completely irrelevant.

Here's how I prove this point.

White Europeans. Woke American idiots love to place this group into a nice neat little box to criticize and trash. But look at the history of white Europeans.

Roman society, (as white and European as any others) was the model of human existence for the time. It might have been the first time in history where humans actually embraced bathing as a daily ritual. And look what took Roman society down: the Angles, Saxons, Jutes, Visigoths, Vandals, all DIVERSE barbaric tribes ruled by the most basic rejection of law and order.

America was settled by the descendants (since you admit they were yours) of some of the most violent tribes of white Europeans the world has ever known. Their diverse nature is not what built America. They could have easily destroyed this lush land. It was the brilliance of the Founding Fathers, who found a way to reject the forces of "diversity" and create the most functional government of all time. And even as this society experienced pains in its evolution, (and the Civil War definitely counts as a violent form of evolution) it continually rejects basic human nature, which is basic diversity.

The Japanese had one of the most orderly societies in the 20th Century. They were a monotheistic, mono racial culture, very orderly and very unnatural. They were a model of rejection of all natural urgings. And they made the mistake of attacking the United States, a country founded by the most violent and vicious races of humans to ever walk the earth. And that resulted in the most horrific end of the Pacific theater of World War Two by the mass incineration of two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki

America may be the most civilized and law abiding nation on the face of the Earth, but it doesn't take a lot to make us totally reject our civilization, embrace the "diversity" of our more natural instincts and wreak all kinds of hell on earth.

[Reason10]

Liberals want tribalism. It's easier to control people that way. If people are at each others throats, the liberals can sneak in to screw the country over.

Liberals aren't nearly that intelligent. They haven't been properly educated on the very concept of "tribalism" or the American model. Liberals represent at times the most pure form of diversity, of nature, of survival of the fittest. And yet, they are too stupid to understand that.

Just look at how confused the liberals are with this thread. Referring to diversity as a force of nature completely yanks them out of their safe space and comfort zone. They do not view words as terms of reality. They use words like slogans, most of the time without even understanding the meaning of such words.

[Reason10]

Boys and girls, what could possibly be more diverse than the line: "Learning from each other, while we do our thing."

(Maybe we should pause, while some woke liberals reach for a tissue.)

That line comes from the Fat Albert cartoon show of (I think) the late Sixties, early Seventies. Probably late Sixties:



Look at the intro to this show, to the Cosby kids.

See any white boys? See any girls? See any Asians? See any homosexuals? Lesbians? $#@!s? Transgenders? They're all black, all from the neighborhood.

And Cosby was not trying to make the point of any idiotic form of "diversity" in telling this story. (By the way, Cosby did say later on in his career that Fat Albert was a real person that he knew from his childhood, along with the others.)

Cosby was making the point that these kids, however goofy and strange looking, were PARENTED. (He even used that term many times in interviews later on.)

And nothing flies in the face of diversity more than proper PARENTING.

[Reason10]

Immigration is normal, mass-immigration involving open borders is not.

Actually, the concept of immigrants wanting to crash the borders, set up shop inside a country and feed off the hard work of others is the most natural, the most DIVERSE thing to do. Human trafficking, illegal drug trade, these are all very NATURAL examples of diversity, of humans rejecting the rules of society to feed their most basic urges and DIVERSITY.




Immigrants do not normally assimilate and it takes the following generation to achieve that, hence the Little Italy’s and Jewish quarters of previous immigrants whose children then joined the mainstream and adopted American values and culture and became Americans.

Perhaps you can 'splain how some groups of migrants (particularly the ILLEGAL variety) have refused to learn the English language and have put their non-English speaking children in our public schools. Maybe you can 'splain how certain sectors of Wisconsin and Michigan have embraced Sharia Law, which flies in the face of the United States Constitution and sets our civil rights laws back 200 years.

I have to deal with non English speaking children in classrooms almost every day. And not ALL the kids who don't speak English are Spanish. Other languages include Portugese, Creole, (from Haiti) and some mongrel Asian languages I've never heard of before. There's no assimilation here at all.

(On the other hand, in one section of southwest Florida--which will not be named here, but is constantly criticized for its large population of Latinos--I've found those brown kids to be VERY well behaved and VERY fluent in English. Seems like their parents definitely reject the "diversity" of letting the kids do whatever they want, and prefer rugged discipline to get the rug rats in line.)




Diversity and holding onto different cultures is the exact opposite of cohesion.

That is quite true. The cohesiveness of the United States of America is the model for the world, the ultimate rejection of the forces of nature. For most of our 200+ year history, people from all walks of life have come here, embraced our civilization and laws and became Americans. They have REJECTED diversity and nature to be a part of this grand experiment.

Some cultures do not generally assimilate, Muslims for instance, because Islam being an ideology clashes with that of a democratic host country. It’s why outside the west open borders and diversity is looked on with horror.

Interestingly enough, pure Muslim cultures, (those who are true followers of the Koran) are a tightly knit society, with very strong moral values and a pure religious sense of devotion. It is DIVERSITY of anger, envy, and ego that drove a lot of Muslim nations to embrace terrorism.

[Reason10]

You have to excuse plo thinks he knows about America .

Ya gotta admit, this thread concept has definitely attracted some interest.