User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Why Abortion Is Antithetical to Women's Empowerment

  1. #1
    Points: 668,112, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433941
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,166
    Points
    668,112
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,224
    Thanked 81,530x in 55,047 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Why Abortion Is Antithetical to Women's Empowerment

    Why Abortion Is Antithetical to Women's Empowerment offers a woman's view on feminism and abortion.

    ...actress Michelle Williams proclaimed in her Golden Globes acceptance speech that she would not have been able to win without “employing a woman’s right to choose.” The media widely lauded her public abortion declaration as a flexing of “Girl Power,” yet it seems distinctly un-empowering to conclude women need to depend on abortion. As if women are too weak or incapable to succeed without it.

    Contrast Williams’ view of Girl Power with authentically empowering messages of three women who are icons of the left. Notwithstanding their own pro-choice beliefs, these women recognize and celebrate Mom Power...[Nancy Pelosi... Ruth Bader Ginsburg...]

    ...And the cost of abortion dependence is indeed tragic, both in terms of babies lost and its effect on mothers. Even some abortion advocates concede this. In Hillary Clinton’s words, “We can all recognize that abortion in many ways represents a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women.”...

    In the political quest for equality, a contentious and litigious new debate has begun over the timeworn Equal Rights Amendment....

    ...The first feminist suffragists proposed an equal rights amendment, but would disavow today’s ERA because they saw abortion as trampling on the rights of the unborn and degrading to women. These celebrated first-wave feminists from Mary Wollstonecraft to Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton recognized that abortion was, in the words of their movement’s leader, Alice Paul, “the ultimate exploitation of women.” Victoria Woodhull, the first woman to run for president (in 1872), declared with her sister and fellow feminist Tennessee Claflin that “pregnancy is not a disease, but a beautiful office of nature.”

    The vision of women’s equality promoted by Roe v. Wade, Michelle Williams, and today’s ERA is far too narrow. It assumes women need to be more like men. But women bear children, and that gift is not a deficiency; humanity’s very existence depends on our life-giving capacity. Women ought to be valued as they are, and Mom Power embraced. In a culture of true equality and authentic female flourishing, women would not be told to choose between their children and their success.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  2. #2
    Points: 50,276, Level: 54
    Level completed: 80%, Points required for next Level: 374
    Overall activity: 3.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteranTagger First Class50000 Experience Points
    Mini Me's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    20517
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Grass Valley, CA
    Posts
    16,814
    Points
    50,276
    Level
    54
    Thanks Given
    4,642
    Thanked 1,661x in 1,296 Posts
    Mentioned
    118 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I see your point! But since you Rethugs empowered abortion as a major WEDGE ISSUE, women have no other choice but to fight for it!

    Abortion should have never been made a political issue in the first place, and I never see any evidence it has actually helped Rethuglicans!

    It is a personal decision that should be made with her doctor, preist, or clergyman and is not for politicians to decide or, men for that matter.

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,770, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,855
    Points
    863,770
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,693
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    I see your point! But since you Rethugs empowered abortion as a major WEDGE ISSUE, women have no other choice but to fight for it!

    Abortion should have never been made a political issue in the first place, and I never see any evidence it has actually helped Rethuglicans!

    It is a personal decision that should be made with her doctor, preist, or clergyman and is not for politicians to decide or, men for that matter.
    What do you tell people who believe abortion is murder?

    Get over it?
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  4. #4
    Points: 668,112, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433941
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,166
    Points
    668,112
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,224
    Thanked 81,530x in 55,047 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Strangelove View Post
    I see your point! But since you Rethugs empowered abortion as a major WEDGE ISSUE, women have no other choice but to fight for it!

    Abortion should have never been made a political issue in the first place, and I never see any evidence it has actually helped Rethuglicans!

    It is a personal decision that should be made with her doctor, preist, or clergyman and is not for politicians to decide or, men for that matter.
    So basically you're saying Republicans control women.

    But I do agree that abortion should be a social issue and not a political one--been saying that since the 90s.

    No, it's more than a personal decision, as it always involves another living human being, if not others.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  5. #5
    Points: 5,566, Level: 17
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 184
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassVeteran5000 Experience Points
    skepticalmike's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    130
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    687
    Points
    5,566
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    78
    Thanked 120x in 98 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    So basically you're saying Republicans control women.

    But I do agree that abortion should be a social issue and not a political one--been saying that since the 90s.

    No, it's more than a personal decision, as it always involves another living human being, if not others.
    Is it fair to call a fetus aborted during the first trimester a living "human being"? I don't think so.

    Is it fair to call an abortion performed during the first trimester murder? I don't think so.

    88% of all abortions are first trimester abortions. The typical fetus at 13 weeks of development is 2.9 inches long and weighs 0.8 ounces. It is about the size of a lemon. Is this a human being?

    A potential human being is not the same thing as a human being and I find it difficult to understand how any rational person can be opposed to legalized first trimester abortions.

    Regarding the OP, I think that the right to an abortion empowers women and without this right they obviously would have less freedom.

    The only argument against abortion that I know of is based on religion so it intrigues me when an atheist takes an anti-abortion stand.

  6. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,770, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497532
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,855
    Points
    863,770
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,693
    Thanked 148,542x in 94,964 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skepticalmike View Post
    Is it fair to call a fetus aborted during the first trimester a living "human being"? I don't think so.

    Is it fair to call an abortion performed during the first trimester murder? I don't think so.

    88% of all abortions are first trimester abortions. The typical fetus at 13 weeks of development is 2.9 inches long and weighs 0.8 ounces. It is about the size of a lemon. Is this a human being?

    A potential human being is not the same thing as a human being and I find it difficult to understand how any rational person can be opposed to legalized first trimester abortions.

    Regarding the OP, I think that the right to an abortion empowers women and without this right they obviously would have less freedom.

    The only argument against abortion that I know of is based on religion so it intrigues me when an atheist takes an anti-abortion stand.
    A fetus's heartbeat begins soon after fertilization and is visible from the sixth week of pregnancy.


    WTF is a fetus? A book-end?
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  7. #7
    Points: 668,112, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433941
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,166
    Points
    668,112
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,224
    Thanked 81,530x in 55,047 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skepticalmike View Post
    Is it fair to call a fetus aborted during the first trimester a living "human being"? I don't think so.

    Is it fair to call an abortion performed during the first trimester murder? I don't think so.

    88% of all abortions are first trimester abortions. The typical fetus at 13 weeks of development is 2.9 inches long and weighs 0.8 ounces. It is about the size of a lemon. Is this a human being?

    A potential human being is not the same thing as a human being and I find it difficult to understand how any rational person can be opposed to legalized first trimester abortions.

    Regarding the OP, I think that the right to an abortion empowers women and without this right they obviously would have less freedom.

    The only argument against abortion that I know of is based on religion so it intrigues me when an atheist takes an anti-abortion stand.

    Is it fair to call a fetus aborted during the first trimester a living "human being"? I don't think so.
    No idea what you mean by fair but scientifically, biologically, medically, it is a living human being from conception.

    88% of all abortions are first trimester abortions. The typical fetus at 13 weeks of development is 2.9 inches long and weighs 0.8 ounces. It is about the size of a lemon. Is this a human being?
    Yes, scientifically, biologically, medically, it is.

    A potential human being is not the same thing as a human being and I find it difficult to understand how any rational person can be opposed to legalized first trimester abortions.
    Agree, but from conception on it is, scientifically, biologically, medically, a living human being.

    Regarding the OP, I think that the right to an abortion empowers women and without this right they obviously would have less freedom.
    Indeed, freedom from responsibility for choices made. One that was invented by the court.

    The only argument against abortion that I know of is based on religion so it intrigues me when an atheist takes an anti-abortion stand.
    One based on science, biology and medical science.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  8. #8
    Points: 145,642, Level: 91
    Level completed: 72%, Points required for next Level: 1,008
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Private Pickle's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    181647
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Rocky Mountain High
    Posts
    49,929
    Points
    145,642
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    8,572
    Thanked 13,114x in 9,773 Posts
    Mentioned
    307 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    What do you tell people who believe abortion is murder?

    Get over it?
    Refer to 410 U.S. 113 which proves them wrong. Don’t like it? Change from within.
    I find your lack of faith...disturbing...

    -Darth Vader

  9. #9
    Points: 5,566, Level: 17
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 184
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassVeteran5000 Experience Points
    skepticalmike's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    130
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Posts
    687
    Points
    5,566
    Level
    17
    Thanks Given
    78
    Thanked 120x in 98 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post

    WTF is a fetus? A book-end?
    A human being gradually evolves from a fertilized egg. A human fertilized egg or embryo is not very different from any other mammalian fertilized egg or embryo except for the

    genetic instruction set. So, I don't understand how a human fertilized egg, embryo, or 13 week old fetus can be called a human being. I can understand how someone who is a

    Christian or a Muslim might think that there exists a soul within an embryo or fetus or that destroying a 13 week fetus is similar to murder but I know of no rational reason to believe this.

    The fact that a heart beat can be detected very early during development doesn't mean anything to me. A heart is just a pump. It is the development of the nervous system, particularly

    the cerebral cortex, that makes us human.

  10. #10
    Points: 668,112, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433941
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,166
    Points
    668,112
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,224
    Thanked 81,530x in 55,047 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by skepticalmike View Post
    A human being gradually evolves from a fertilized egg. A human fertilized egg or embryo is not very different from any other mammalian fertilized egg or embryo except for the

    genetic instruction set. So, I don't understand how a human fertilized egg, embryo, or 13 week old fetus can be called a human being. I can understand how someone who is a

    Christian or a Muslim might think that there exists a soul within an embryo or fetus or that destroying a 13 week fetus is similar to murder but I know of no rational reason to believe this.

    The fact that a heart beat can be detected very early during development doesn't mean anything to me. A heart is just a pump. It is the development of the nervous system, particularly

    the cerebral cortex, that makes us human.

    Human beings do not evolve from a fertilized egg. Total misunderstanding of evolution!

    They devlop...as human beings....not a cow or elephant or spider--human being.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (02-08-2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts