The fault line concerning abortion

[Chris]

Good luck with that in this case.

It aborted your petty arguments.

[jet57]

It aborted your petty arguments.

Not at all. It's just you trying to get around something you can't credibly defend.

We're stuck with abortion and nobody would have noticed had it not been for the evangelicals.

[Chris]

not at all. It's just you trying to get around something you can't credibly defend.

We're stuck with abortion and nobody would have noticed had it not been for the evangelicals.

it seems to me that, in this country at any rate, the anti abortion movement is based solely evangelical christian politics, and as we have a separation in this country, i don't see how such a faction can legally influence such a procedure. So i will agree with your statement. I would add that, no matter where one acquires "thoughts" on subjects, said thoughts should be applied - in public, say legislatively, with concentrated objectivity bearing in mind legal standings that associate with our constitution. Otherwise such objections are nothing but faction rhetoric that means nothing.

objectively, that is, scientifically, biologically, medically, life begins at conception. And we are all created equally with equal rights, by declaration and constitution.

q.e.d.

[jet57]

q.e.d.

Once again, none of that means anything to the subject of the discussion because the subject of the discussion is "what motivates the antiabortionists". I say it's the ideals of the Christian evangelicals. So let's try and stay on topic shall we?

[Chris]

Once again, none of that means anything to the subject of the discussion because the subject of the discussion is "what motivates the antiabortionists". I say it's the ideals of the Christian evangelicals. So let's try and stay on topic shall we?

It aborted your petty argument.

[jet57]

It aborted your petty argument.

Has done nothing of the sort. C'mon dude; apply some of that big brain of yours and quit trolling.

[Chris]

has done nothing of the sort. C'mon dude; apply some of that big brain of yours and quit trolling.

q.e.d.

[jet57]

q.e.d.

Ya'can't do it. Like I said, you're just not qualified in the context of this thread.

[bulletbob]

I seriously doubt that we will come to any consensus as concerning the ethical (or non-ethical) nature of abortion-on-demand--at least, anytime within this generation. So I will not approach the matter directly.

But I will ask this:

Do others agree that one's stance on the matter is really determined by whether one believes that our country should be entirely (and unapologetically) secular, or should be underpinned by Judeo-Christian thought?

To reiterate, I am not asking for a re-litigation of the matter. I am merely asking if others would agree that this is the fault line.

If you dont know the ethical differance I really feel sory for you comrade jet it has nothing to do with relgion it has to do with right and wrong .

[jet57]

If you dont know the ethical differance I really feel sory for you comrade jet it has nothing to do with relgion it has to do with right and wrong .

Uh, I'm not pjohns and differance is spelled d-i-f-f-e-r-e-n-c-e.

just sayin