Peter1469 (02-14-2020)
Initially they deceived him by letting him believe that he was not a subject of an investigation. That's why they did not advise him of his rights. After that is when the investigators said that he did not lie of deceive them. They changed their stance when they became aware that was the wrong answer.
MisterVeritis (02-14-2020),Peter1469 (02-14-2020)
I've posted that three times now, haven't you followed along?It seems that there was a serious prosecutorial misconduct in the Flynn case.
That assertion has nothing to do with anything in his OP source OR the thread title.
It's a baseless unsourced assertion that is a lie. The second post in the thread asked the very same thing.
MisterVeritis (02-14-2020)