Libs arent very good at math/fighter jets

[Cotton1]

I had a talk with a lib the other day who said "free tuition would only be the cost of 2 SR22 Fighter Jets. Oh really? $70 billion for free ride tuition/$150 million for a 22. thats actually (off top of my head) about 465 22's.

[Cotton1]

The average fighter jet is about $40 million. The $70 Billion would buy about 1750 of them. thats almost our entire Air Force.

Air force	United States	Russia
Fighters/Multiroles	1840	1319
Bombers	162	181
Early warning (radar aircraft)	52	21
Transport	805	255

8 more rows

[Cotton1]

Zee Vussian peoples and they bossman Blab'Mir Vutin have a big Air Force too, yez?

[countryboy]

Libs are horrible at math. Even in the latest Democrat debate, the moderator was asking questions about Bernie's proposed 60 trillion dollars of new spending. People have run the actual numbers and the reality is, it's closer to 97 trillion dollars Bernie is proposing. there simply is no way to pay for it, even if we confiscated all of the wealth of every single person in the United States of America, we would still come up short. This is basic 5th grade math.

https://www.city-journal.org/bernie-...ding-proposals

All told, Sanders’s current plans would cost as much as $97.5 trillion over the next decade, and total government spending at all levels would surge to as high as 70 percent of gross domestic product. Approximately half of the American workforce would be employed by the government. The ten-year budget deficit would approach $90 trillion, with average annual deficits exceeding 30 percent of GDP.

This unprecedented outlay would more than double the size of the federal government. Over the next decade, Washington is already projected to spend $60 trillion, and state and local governments will spend another $29.7 trillion from non-federal sources. Adding Sanders’s $97.5 trillion—and then subtracting the $3 trillion saved by state governments under Medicare For All—would raise the total cost of government to $184 trillion, or 70 percent of the projected GDP over ten years

Sanders’s agenda is virtually impossible to pay for. Adding $97.5 trillion in new spending to an underlying $15.5 trillion projected budget deficit (under current policies) creates a ten-year budget gap of $113 trillion. Yet Sanders’s tax proposals would raise at most $23 trillion over the decade.

[Cotton1]

Libs are horrible at math. Even in the latest Democrat debate, the moderator was asking questions about Bernie's proposed 60 trillion dollars of new spending. People have run the actual numbers and the reality is, it's closer to 97 trillion dollars Bernie is proposing. there simply is no way to pay for it, even if we confiscated all of the wealth of every single person in the United States of America, we would still come up short. This is basic 5th grade math.

https://www.city-journal.org/bernie-...ding-proposals

All told, Sanders’s current plans would cost as much as $97.5 trillion over the next decade, and total government spending at all levels would surge to as high as 70 percent of gross domestic product. Approximately half of the American workforce would be employed by the government. The ten-year budget deficit would approach $90 trillion, with average annual deficits exceeding 30 percent of GDP.

This unprecedented outlay would more than double the size of the federal government. Over the next decade, Washington is already projected to spend $60 trillion, and state and local governments will spend another $29.7 trillion from non-federal sources. Adding Sanders’s $97.5 trillion—and then subtracting the $3 trillion saved by state governments under Medicare For All—would raise the total cost of government to $184 trillion, or 70 percent of the projected GDP over ten years

Sanders’s agenda is virtually impossible to pay for. Adding $97.5 trillion in new spending to an underlying $15.5 trillion projected budget deficit (under current policies) creates a ten-year budget gap of $113 trillion. Yet Sanders’s tax proposals would raise at most $23 trillion over the decade.

thats roughly $600,000 per taxpayer. amortized at $60k per year/$30 an hour of income. Americans only presented earnings totaled of about 10T last year which is Sanders annual spending proposal. hes a POS pandering to retards.