Trust us we're the experts

[Just AnotherPerson]

Nothing to see here folks.... Event 201 hypothetical exercise on dealing with a coronavirus pandemic.
http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/about

Excerpt:

"The next severe pandemic will not only cause great illness and loss of life but could also trigger major cascading economic and societal consequences that could contribute greatly to global impact and suffering. The Event 201 pandemic exercise, conducted on October 18, 2019, vividly demonstrated a number of these important gaps in pandemic preparedness as well as some of the elements of the solutions between the public and private sectors that will be needed to fill them. The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation jointly propose these recommendations."



Major players:
Bill Gates
John Hopkins
World Economic forum
World Health Organization

Exercise highlights:

This is in full swing. They are already implementing control as stated in the video above.
WHO in full curb mode
https://keyt.com/lifestyle/money-and...rom-spreading/

Facebook already censoring.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ronavirus.html

More
https://www.dailydot.com/irl/coronav...ation-twitter/

[Just AnotherPerson]

Dammage control mode
http://www.centerforhealthsecurity.o...-Event201.html

Excerpt:

Statement about nCoV and our pandemic exercise

In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction.

[Just AnotherPerson]

None of these guys are heavily involved in population control right?? I mean that's conspiracy stuff.

I mean John Hopkins isin't invlolved in population research.
https://popcenter.jhu.edu/


Excerpt:

medical science, and biostatistics in emerging areas of population research. HPC promotes innovative methodology beyond traditional demography to integrate systems science and computational modeling. HPC promotes exemplary interdisciplinary research that is translational to inform policy makers

Well at least the world health organization is not involved in population control right?

_{^{https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/90/2/12-040212/en/}}

How about Bill gates? He would never.






How about that World Economic Forum? Certainly there is no agenda at work. Right?
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/...global-system/

[Just AnotherPerson]

Bill Gates truly cares about the population. What a benevolent being he must be.
His wifes foundation dontated nearly 400 million towards population control, how philanthropic of them.
https://www.thenewamerican.com/cultu...ntrol-abortion

Glad to know Bill Gates cares so much about birth control. The benevolence is off the charts.
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/wirel...trol_n_5568336

It's hard to believe this amazing man provides vaccines for the world, he loves us so much he doesn't even vaccinate his own children. Probably so he can save the lives of the poor right!?
https://www.uspoliticsandnews.com/wh...-own-children/

How will we ever thank you?
https://www.liveaction.org/news/bill...ation-control/

[Just AnotherPerson]

Just what is population planning anyways?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_population_planning

Thankfully our gov has never been involved in these kinds of dealings, right!?
Meet the Kissinger Report, it's a nice little read if you have some spare time. It's rosy.
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf

I wonder how many organizations there are working on population control right now? Probably not many.
https://overpopulation-project.com/o...verpopulation/

I wonder what the United Nations thinks about our growing population?
https://www.un.org/en/sections/issues-depth/population/

What a bad source, I'm sure this isn't real.
https://www.intellihub.com/united-na...-for-humanity/

Really, nothing to see here folks.
http://reports.weforum.org/global-ri...utive-summary/

[Just AnotherPerson]

Certainly population control is off the table.
https://futurism.com/new-report-asse...illion-by-2050

Certainly Elon Musk wouldn't be on board....
https://futurism.com/elon-musk-the-w...wards-collapse

Neither would Al Gore right???
https://www.climatedepot.com/2018/12...l-for-climate/

Certainly Agenda 21 is just talk of conspiracy theorists and not real right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_21


Meh... It's probably nuthin'.

[Just AnotherPerson]

Thing that make you go hmm.....


OOPs, did we reach the threshold? See page 8-9 #23.
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PCAAB500.pdf

Excerpt:

General Goals and Requirements for Dealing With Rapid Population Growth

23. The central question for world population policy in the year 1974, is whether mankind is to remain on a track toward an ultimate population of 12 to 15 billion -- implying a five to seven-fold increase in almost all the underdeveloped world outside of China -- or whether (despite the momentum of population growth) it can be switched over to the course of earliest feasible population stability -- implying ultimate totals of 8 to 9 billions and not more than a three or four-fold increase in any major region.
PG9-10, #28&29

28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:

(a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and

(b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.

29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two- child family on the average), by about the year2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000 compared to the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for developing national population growth control targets to achieve this world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action.

[MMC]

Trust us we're the experts


CNN labels coronavirus a pandemic ahead of WHO and CDC

[waltky]

Just AnotherPerson...


... Uncle Ferd thinks...

... you is a lovely lady!

[Just AnotherPerson]

Just AnotherPerson...


... Uncle Ferd thinks...

... you is a lovely lady!

Thank you Uncle Ferd.
That's not the kind of comment I normally receive Lol.
Normally it is more like enemy who must die, conspiracy theorist, Leftist, Evil, Marxist...... well you get the idea.