Thanks for that perspective.
I am not commenting specifically on the full knowledge of what brought this challenge on or the intent of the judge but far too many people misuse the 1099 style employees. A contractor style employee was designed to use someone for services over the short term because the need was short term.
This is abused too often with low wage employees who only work at one location to avoid employer owed payroll taxes, workman's comp, benefits.... If you want to find these people then look at your local gym, your landscaper and other jobs that both parties have no intention of being short term.
The second abuse is people over 50 that become unemployed. People do not want to hire them because they are protected by age discrimination laws so they work as consultants for years for a single company as self-employed. This was a massive move of professionals after the Obama recession by people in their late 50s and early 60s that were not able to retire but also would not be considered for a job. They were suddenly in high demand as consultants. Many journalists are often contributors to only one media outlet and forced to sign no-compete contracts.
The problem is that they will probably just lose their contracts and no be hired.