“Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
--Donald Trump
Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.
MisterVeritis (08-12-2020),MMC (08-12-2020),stjames1_53 (08-12-2020)
That’s for the full court to decide, not you or me.
Fine, but they need the leave of the court. If the court believes there is political influence the court may have a reason to deny leave. The higher court will ultimately decide if Sulivan deserved all the nasty names you guys have called him. If they determine that he was correct to deny that leave will you encourage your friends here to apologize to him? Or will you start insulting the whole panel? I say that, not knowing or believing how they will decide.Withholding Bradey material is a valid reason for the DoJ to take that action.
Last edited by TheLiquidGuy; 08-12-2020 at 10:09 AM.
“Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
--Donald Trump
Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.
MMC (08-12-2020)
For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
- Thucydides
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
carolina73 (08-12-2020)
Call your state legislators and insist they approve the Article V convention of States to propose amendments.
I pledge allegiance to the Constitution as written and understood by this nation's founders, and to the Republic it created, an indivisible union of sovereign States, with liberty and justice for all.
stjames1_53 (08-12-2020)
MisterVeritis (08-12-2020),stjames1_53 (08-12-2020)
I didn't say he could prosecute.
My concerns are (1) the honor of the judge that you all have derided simply because you don’t like his ruling as well as (2) the unacceptable special treatment for friends of the president..
There is good reason to suspect political influence. That influence must not be allowed to prevail. Prosecutors have resigned over this. Barr has been asked to resign by Prosecutor associations. A judge associations has convened “emergency” meeting over Barr’s questionable conduct. There are plausible threads of logic that point to preferential treatment. Flynn may or may not be guilty of lying to the FBI. We know he lied to government about it, including Mike Pence. It doesn't seem far fetched he would have continued lying. But even if he is innocent, can we allow this case to get special treatment and move on without ameliorating the system in it’s wake?
“Just say the election was corrupt and leave the
rest to me and the Republican congressmen”
--Donald Trump
Speaking to the Justice Department on Dec. 27, 2020. Conversation memorialized in then-acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue’s contemporaneous notes.
For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
"The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
- Thucydides
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum
MisterVeritis (08-12-2020)