User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 28

Thread: Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497521
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,531x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

    Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

    I beat up Obama over abusing his executive order authority. I have mentioned Trump doing it in passing. But it is time to directly hit Trump for doing the same thing Obama did.

    EOs are supposed to be used to clarify laws Congress passes- often Congress writes a law generally expecting the executive to fill in the details with both rulemaking (regulations) and executive orders. Those EOs are based on a statute. When a president uses EOs to either deviate from the intent of a law or create a new law, that president is overstepping his authority.

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Threatening to shut down Twitter for flagging false content. Claiming he can “override” governors who dare to keep churches closed to congregants. Asserting the “absolute authority” to force states to reopen, even when local leaders say it’s too soon.
    As he battles the coronavirus pandemic, President Donald Trump has been claiming extraordinarily sweeping powers that legal scholars say the president simply doesn’t have. And he has repeatedly refused to spell out the legal basis for those powers.
    “It’s not that the president doesn’t have a remarkable amount of power to respond to a public health crisis. It’s that these are not the powers he has,” said Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas School of Law professor who specializes in constitutional and national security law.
    Asked Tuesday what authority he had to enforce such a mandate, Trump was cagey.

    “I can absolutely do it if I want to,” he said. “We have many different ways where I can override them and if I have to, I’ll do that.”
    No, Mr. President, you can't.

    The article would have more credibility if it has mentioned that Obama abused the EO process too.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Chris (05-28-2020),Helena (05-28-2020),MMC (05-28-2020),pragmatic (05-28-2020),Private Pickle (05-28-2020),stjames1_53 (05-28-2020),The Xl (05-28-2020)

  3. #2
    Points: 139,040, Level: 89
    Level completed: 88%, Points required for next Level: 410
    Overall activity: 42.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    58441
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    50,860
    Points
    139,040
    Level
    89
    Thanks Given
    105,009
    Thanked 29,462x in 20,421 Posts
    Mentioned
    175 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've always consider EO's unconstitutional. If there is a problem with that law, let SCOTUS decide whether or not it needs to be send back to wherever it was created and let them hash it out.
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  4. #3
    Points: 145,053, Level: 91
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,597
    Overall activity: 71.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44122
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    58,027
    Points
    145,053
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,491
    Thanked 44,127x in 28,523 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would call the House of Representatives running away to be illegal. Go back to work or leave your job.

    Nancy Pelosi is the House under her new rules. She has taken over 1/3 of government. She is writing any legislation herself with zero input from the hundreds of other elected representatives. Opposition is not allowed. We should be focused on that.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carolina73 For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-28-2020),stjames1_53 (05-28-2020)

  6. #4
    Points: 145,053, Level: 91
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 1,597
    Overall activity: 71.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44122
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    58,027
    Points
    145,053
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,491
    Thanked 44,127x in 28,523 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Executive orders do not create law. That is what Obama did wrong. Executive Orders clarify existing law. So each circumstance has to be discussed individually. if Trump can find a law that is on the books that was passed and signed which gave exemption of limited social media on the internet in some way then he can "clarify" it.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carolina73 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-30-2020),Peter1469 (05-28-2020)

  8. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497521
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,531x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by stjames1_53 View Post
    I've always consider EO's unconstitutional. If there is a problem with that law, let SCOTUS decide whether or not it needs to be send back to wherever it was created and let them hash it out.
    I have no problem so long as they are used properly as I stated above.

    Most EOs are administrative in nature.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Peter1469 For This Useful Post:

    Tahuyaman (05-30-2020)

  10. #6
    Points: 668,014, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433923
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,145
    Points
    668,014
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,217
    Thanked 81,512x in 55,039 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

    I beat up Obama over abusing his executive order authority. I have mentioned Trump doing it in passing. But it is time to directly hit Trump for doing the same thing Obama did.

    EOs are supposed to be used to clarify laws Congress passes- often Congress writes a law generally expecting the executive to fill in the details with both rulemaking (regulations) and executive orders. Those EOs are based on a statute. When a president uses EOs to either deviate from the intent of a law or create a new law, that president is overstepping his authority.





    No, Mr. President, you can't.

    The article would have more credibility if it has mentioned that Obama abused the EO process too.

    Agree. He did fine dealing with Covid19 by leaving it to the governors to deal with but demanding they do anything crosses the line of his authority.

    With the twitter thing, I think all he did after threats was EO a review of the law. Not sure that crosses any line.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  11. #7
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,691, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497521
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,846
    Points
    863,691
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,691
    Thanked 148,531x in 94,963 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    Agree. He did fine dealing with Covid19 by leaving it to the governors to deal with but demanding they do anything crosses the line of his authority.

    With the twitter thing, I think all he did after threats was EO a review of the law. Not sure that crosses any line.
    You don't need an executive order to review a law. Assign it to White House legal staff and move onto something else.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  12. #8
    Points: 668,014, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.8%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive50000 Experience PointsTagger First ClassVeteran
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    433923
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    198,145
    Points
    668,014
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    32,217
    Thanked 81,512x in 55,039 Posts
    Mentioned
    2014 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    You don't need an executive order to review a law. Assign it to White House legal staff and move onto something else.
    Looks like he wants the FCC to do it: "Under the order, the Commerce Department would ask the Federal Communications Commission for new regulations clarifying when a company's conduct might violate the good faith provisions of Section 230". https://www.cnn.com/2020/05/28/polit...der/index.html

    If they wrote the rule, they can revise it.


    The problem is Congress shouldn't write vague laws for the technocratic clerisy to fill in the details.
    Tradition is not the worship of ashes, but the preservation of fire. ― Gustav Mahler

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chris For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-30-2020),MMC (05-28-2020)

  14. #9
    Points: 43,841, Level: 51
    Level completed: 18%, Points required for next Level: 1,409
    Overall activity: 13.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10224
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,729
    Points
    43,841
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,421
    Thanked 10,215x in 6,438 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

    I beat up Obama over abusing his executive order authority. I have mentioned Trump doing it in passing. But it is time to directly hit Trump for doing the same thing Obama did.

    EOs are supposed to be used to clarify laws Congress passes- often Congress writes a law generally expecting the executive to fill in the details with both rulemaking (regulations) and executive orders. Those EOs are based on a statute. When a president uses EOs to either deviate from the intent of a law or create a new law, that president is overstepping his authority.





    No, Mr. President, you can't.

    The article would have more credibility if it has mentioned that Obama abused the EO process too.
    Trump claims a lot of things in opinion that he cannot do and does not do. His EO to review the section 220 legislation is hardly beyond his power and a Congressman is introducing a bill to strip editorializing social media platforms of their special status which ironically enough, was a democrat idea to begin with.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Hoosier8 For This Useful Post:

    MisterVeritis (05-30-2020)

  16. #10
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Trump continues to claim broad powers he doesn’t have

    I beat up Obama over abusing his executive order authority. I have mentioned Trump doing it in passing. But it is time to directly hit Trump for doing the same thing Obama did.

    EOs are supposed to be used to clarify laws Congress passes- often Congress writes a law generally expecting the executive to fill in the details with both rulemaking (regulations) and executive orders. Those EOs are based on a statute. When a president uses EOs to either deviate from the intent of a law or create a new law, that president is overstepping his authority.





    No, Mr. President, you can't.

    The article would have more credibility if it has mentioned that Obama abused the EO process too.
    No he can't, and he knows he cant. But talking about he can. Does put the spotlight on the Demos and what they are doing with the lockdowns. Notice they are all on the defensive. Losing in Court and more importantly. Having their voters totally disregard their EOs.

    As for Twitter. Trump isn't going to shut down Twitter. He has 80 million followers.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to MMC For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (05-28-2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts