Trump pleaded with China to help win the 2020 election

[TheLiquidGuy]

*The case against Trump was strong and even some Republicans acknowledged that after their "not guilty" vote.*

Now now TLG, there's no need to make things up.

At least two Senators that eventually voted not guilty acknowledged the allegations were true. Marco Rubio, and Lamar Alexander.


From the LA Times
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-02-04/impeachment-donald-trump-lamar-alexander-joni-ernst-joe-biden

"Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Marco Rubio (R- Fla.) were the first out of the block to explain that the president is guilty but shouldn’t be ousted for it.


In a statement, Rubio explained that he always worked from the assumption the charges were true, but: “Just because actions meet a standard of impeachment does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a President from office.”


Alexander was even more emphatic. In his statement, he said the House managers “have proved [the charges] with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’” In an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Alexander dismissed the need for more witnesses. “If you have eight witnesses who say someone left the scene of an accident, why do you need nine? I mean, the question for me was: Do I need more evidence to conclude that the president did what he did? And I concluded no.”

[stjames1_53]

At least two Senators that eventually voted not guilty acknowledged the allegations were true. Marco Rubio, and Lamar Alexander.


From the LA Times
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2020-02-04/impeachment-donald-trump-lamar-alexander-joni-ernst-joe-biden

"Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) and Marco Rubio (R- Fla.) were the first out of the block to explain that the president is guilty but shouldn’t be ousted for it.


In a statement, Rubio explained that he always worked from the assumption the charges were true, but: “Just because actions meet a standard of impeachment does not mean it is in the best interest of the country to remove a President from office.”


Alexander was even more emphatic. In his statement, he said the House managers “have proved [the charges] with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’” In an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Alexander dismissed the need for more witnesses. “If you have eight witnesses who say someone left the scene of an accident, why do you need nine? I mean, the question for me was: Do I need more evidence to conclude that the president did what he did? And I concluded no.”

and with all of that bullsh!t, you guys still failed.................
Besides, Alexander will say about anything to take Trump's place.