User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 35

Thread: Social Security Question

  1. #11
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497420
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,731
    Points
    863,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,642
    Thanked 148,430x in 94,898 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think you have to apply for Medicare. There are penalties associated with filing late.

    Is Medicare mandatory?

    Medicare is a federal benefit that you pay for through taxes during your working years. At age 65, or if you have certain disabilities, you become eligible for health coverage through various parts of the Medicare program.


    While Medicare isn’t necessarily mandatory, it is automatically offered in some situations, and may take some effort to opt out of.
    Are there penalties if you don’t enroll in Medicare when you are eligible?

    The penalties for choosing not to enroll in Medicare, or enrolling late, can be just as confusing as figuring out which parts of the program are mandatory. The penalty levels for not enrolling when you are first eligible for Medicare, again, depend on the program.

    Quote Originally Posted by FindersKeepers View Post
    I'm a ways off from retirement, but like you, I don't want to retire and I intend to work as long as I can.

    Someone here--maybe Dr. Who?--said I should that even though I don't want to retire, I need to apply for (I think) Medicare because otherwise, I'll miss out on something. Darnit! I even printed that advice out and now I can't find what I did with it.

    I hope she (or whoever offered the advice) sees this thread.

    I'm pretty sure it was important.

    Now, I feel as though dementia is setting in and perhaps I should retire early. LOL
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #12
    Points: 144,945, Level: 91
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 1,705
    Overall activity: 79.0%
    Achievements:
    Social50000 Experience PointsOverdriveVeteran
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44085
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    57,980
    Points
    144,945
    Level
    91
    Thanks Given
    56,458
    Thanked 44,090x in 28,499 Posts
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    I'm 66 and I have no intention of retiring from my present job any time soon...but I'm wondering whether there is any substantive upside, in my case, to my waiting till I'm 70 to apply for Security Security benefits.

    They urge you to wait by dangling that extra monthly payout - in my case, about $600 - if you wait until you're older. But I've done the math, and between now and when I turn 70, if I apply and start collecting benefits now, I'll collect in excess of $77K during that 3 1/2 years. Not a fortune, but a nice chunk of money. On the other hand, if I wait until 70 to apply, that extra $600 a month would not add up to $77K until I was 81 years old. And given my medical history and condition, that is a considerable long shot; if I make it to 75, quite frankly I'll be surprised.

    My Social Security income is always going to be taxable at the maximum 85% regardless of when I take it and whether or not I'm working, because my military pension plus the percentage of the payments they count as income would push me over that threshold at which the 85% kicks in.

    If I apply for and start receiving payments now, chances are I would be able to just save or invest the money, so I'm trying to determine whether there is any downside to my doing it now instead of waiting.
    Because this is some thing that I will have to deal with, you got me really curious. The on biggest draw back to collecting early is that your wife would only get half of your reduced benefit.
    So, if your wife has a long bloodline it could cost her serious money after you pass. The example I saw was that the spouse would collect 32.5% of your benefit if you retire at 65 instead of 50% at 70.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to carolina73 For This Useful Post:

    Standing Wolf (06-21-2020)

  4. #13
    Points: 75,458, Level: 67
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 2,292
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    315134
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    25,843
    Points
    75,458
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    5,775
    Thanked 21,251x in 12,376 Posts
    Mentioned
    417 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    Because this is some thing that I will have to deal with, you got me really curious. The on biggest draw back to collecting early is that your wife would only get half of your reduced benefit.
    So, if your wife has a long bloodline it could cost her serious money after you pass. The example I saw was that the spouse would collect 32.5% of your benefit if you retire at 65 instead of 50% at 70.
    That is something I will definitely have to look into. Thanks!
    Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard

    "Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak." - Larry McMurtry

  5. #14
    Points: 75,458, Level: 67
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 2,292
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    Standing Wolf's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    315134
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    25,843
    Points
    75,458
    Level
    67
    Thanks Given
    5,775
    Thanked 21,251x in 12,376 Posts
    Mentioned
    417 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by carolina73 View Post
    Because this is some thing that I will have to deal with, you got me really curious. The on biggest draw back to collecting early is that your wife would only get half of your reduced benefit.
    So, if your wife has a long bloodline it could cost her serious money after you pass. The example I saw was that the spouse would collect 32.5% of your benefit if you retire at 65 instead of 50% at 70.
    I did some further reading on the SSA website, and from what I'm seeing there as long as I was at my full retirement age of 66 (which I am now) when I begin drawing benefits, the spousal survivor benefit would be 100%. I think the only thing that would reduce the percentage would be if the surviving spouse is not, themselves, of retirement age - and mine is 62 now, so that isn't an issue.
    Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard

    "Only a rank degenerate would drive 1,500 miles across Texas and not eat a chicken fried steak." - Larry McMurtry

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Standing Wolf For This Useful Post:

    Captdon (06-25-2020)

  7. #15
    Points: 123,366, Level: 85
    Level completed: 17%, Points required for next Level: 2,684
    Overall activity: 60.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsSocialVeteran
    FindersKeepers's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    173984
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    35,702
    Points
    123,366
    Level
    85
    Thanks Given
    25,436
    Thanked 26,625x in 16,267 Posts
    Mentioned
    271 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I think you have to apply for Medicare. There are penalties associated with filing late.
    Thanks Peter.

    I knew there was something about that.
    ""A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul" ~George Bernard Shaw

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to FindersKeepers For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (06-22-2020)

  9. #16
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497420
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,731
    Points
    863,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,642
    Thanked 148,430x in 94,898 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by FindersKeepers View Post
    Thanks Peter.

    I knew there was something about that.
    I expect that once you are 65 a private plan (other than Medicare supplements) wouldn't see you a policy.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  10. #17
    Points: 43,785, Level: 51
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,465
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10209
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,709
    Points
    43,785
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,419
    Thanked 10,200x in 6,432 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Standing Wolf View Post
    I'm 66 and I have no intention of retiring from my present job any time soon...but I'm wondering whether there is any substantive upside, in my case, to my waiting till I'm 70 to apply for Security Security benefits.

    They urge you to wait by dangling that extra monthly payout - in my case, about $600 - if you wait until you're older. But I've done the math, and between now and when I turn 70, if I apply and start collecting benefits now, I'll collect in excess of $77K during that 3 1/2 years. Not a fortune, but a nice chunk of money. On the other hand, if I wait until 70 to apply, that extra $600 a month would not add up to $77K until I was 81 years old. And given my medical history and condition, that is a considerable long shot; if I make it to 75, quite frankly I'll be surprised.

    My Social Security income is always going to be taxable at the maximum 85% regardless of when I take it and whether or not I'm working, because my military pension plus the percentage of the payments they count as income would push me over that threshold at which the 85% kicks in.

    If I apply for and start receiving payments now, chances are I would be able to just save or invest the money, so I'm trying to determine whether there is any downside to my doing it now instead of waiting.
    Did the calc myself and decided to take SS at 66. Still plan on retiring around 70. Gain 120k extra by 70 and payback if I waited till 70 was something like 3.5 years. Who knows if I would live that long.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Hoosier8 For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (06-22-2020),Standing Wolf (06-22-2020)

  12. #18
    Points: 43,785, Level: 51
    Level completed: 14%, Points required for next Level: 1,465
    Overall activity: 10.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran25000 Experience Points
    Hoosier8's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    10209
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    13,709
    Points
    43,785
    Level
    51
    Thanks Given
    1,419
    Thanked 10,200x in 6,432 Posts
    Mentioned
    65 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    I think you have to apply for Medicare. There are penalties associated with filing late.
    At 65. Since I still work and have insurance I can wait to get plan B when I retire.
    When Donald Trump said to protest “peacefully”, he meant violence.

    When he told protesters to “go home”, he meant stay for an insurrection.

    And when he told Brad Raffensperger to implement “whatever the correct legal remedy is”, he meant fraud.

    War is peace.

    Freedom is slavery.

    Ignorance is strength.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Hoosier8 For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (06-22-2020)

  14. #19
    Points: 64,854, Level: 62
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,696
    Overall activity: 1.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranSocial
    texan's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    32881
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    12,691
    Points
    64,854
    Level
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,525
    Thanked 5,771x in 3,860 Posts
    Mentioned
    125 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    Yes, in 3035 checks get slashed by 25% unless Congress does something.
    3035 or 2025?
    I am tired of everyone fighting with each other. This is all by design.

  15. #20
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,155, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497420
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,731
    Points
    863,155
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,642
    Thanked 148,430x in 94,898 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by texan View Post
    3035 or 2025?
    2035
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts