It's not to happen. It's just another liberal stunt.
It's not to happen. It's just another liberal stunt.
carolina73 (06-26-2020)
No taxation without representation. If you didn’t want D.C. to become a state, you shouldn’t have let people live there.
Make the National Mall a separate entity and the rest of D.C. state 51.
"Those who produce should have, but we know that those who produce the most — that is, those who work hardest, and at the most difficult and most menial tasks, have the least."
- Eugene V. Debs (1855-1926), five-time Socialist Party candidate for U.S. President
stephenpe (07-02-2020)
Green Arrow (06-26-2020)
Dr. Who (06-26-2020),Green Arrow (06-26-2020),stephenpe (07-02-2020)
No need to make DC into a state. While the snowflakes yell out No Taxation without representation.
Give then what they don't want. Exempt DC from paying Federal taxes. Problem solved.
This will definitely benefit Repubs. Since DC would be like Puerto Rico and Guam. Which means then the snowflakes can't vote in federal elections.
Furthermore, the political dynamics puts this idea directly in the conservatives' sweet spot. Conservatives could hardly be charged with indifference to the plight of nonvoting District residents, and leftists would be faced with a stark choice: Either defend the taxation of District residents (including the large percentage who are poor) or accede to a policy that will demonstrate, once and for all, the economic benefits of lower taxes.
Exempting them would revitalize the district and at the same time would put the Deviates into a no win situation.
History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~
MisterVeritis (06-26-2020)
carolina73 (06-26-2020)
Article One Section 8:
"The Congress shall have power [...]:
To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings;"
Having the power to do something, doesn't mean that it has to do that thing. There is no reason why the seat of federal government can't be in any given state - the land that government buildings occupy simply become federal property. There really is no longer any need for the District of Columbia to exist at all. Rather than make a new state, just give DC back to Maryland and Virginia.
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi
Cannons Front (07-01-2020),Green Arrow (06-26-2020)
Why? That land came from Maryland. Give it back.
District of Columbia retrocession
District of Columbia retrocession is the process of returning to the U.S. states of Virginia and/or Maryland the land that had been ceded to the federal government of the United States for the purpose of creating its federal district for the new national capital of the United States, the City of Washington. The land was ceded in 1790. The Virginia portion was returned, after many stages of federal and state approval, in March 1847. The Maryland portion still constitutes the District of Columbia, but some have proposed retroceding it back, in part or in whole, to address issues with the voting rights of District of Columbia residents.
ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
MisterVeritis (06-26-2020)
As I pointed out the last time this issue came up, allowing the District to become part of Maryland just makes the underrepresentation of Democratic voters in the Senate even worse. Democratic senators represent a majority of Americans, but have only 47 seats in the Senate. Adding two more Democratic senators helps to fix that problem. Just increasing the number of voters represented by the existing Maryland senators does not.