Biden Cancer Charity Paid Execs Millions, But Didn't Spend Much Fighting Cancer

[FindersKeepers]

That is his MO. He does it on purpose.

He seems to, especially when he's arguing a point he can't logically defend.

[Captdon]

Nice try.


Like yourself, who started this thread with a bogus citation that was full of lies, the post you are defending attempted to tie a totally separate set of issues that have nothing to do with Joe Biden, to the cancer initiative. In fact, the paragraphs that directly follow the one paragraph that was used in the post, refute the premise of the claim that was being made.

When I cite a source, I post a paragraph or two in order to make the point, and include a link. I fully expect people to use the link, although many here rely solely on headlines for their information.

That's hardly the same as doing what you did. Claiming that Biden took fully 60% of all monies raised by the charity for his political supporters. Or what Keepers did. Purposely redacting the bulk of article that paints a totally different picture than the one he was trying to make in support of your bogus premise.

Only an idiot would supply a link that proves them a liar. But, I find that Conservatives rarely check facts. They just run here to post random lies that were pitched on Fox News.

My link proved you're wrong. You change facts to prove your posts. You're dishonest.

[Captdon]

Most people who get caught with their pants down just pull them up. This fool pretends they aren't down.

[zelmo1234]

Because they lost political clout. Do you have evidence of mishandling of donations? Remember...the OP stated immediately that he knows that trump is a grifter, and other charities aren't part of this discussion.
Unless you'd like to expand the parameters now?

Yep, Everyone knew it was just income for them and payment for political favors.

Chelsea used foundation money for a wedding for goodness sake.

[carolina73]

I went to the charity navigator website and read the tax forms for the group. They spent the bulk of their money on staff and cancer conferences, not executive pay. That’s entirely consistent with their stated entirely legitimate charitable functions. They’re were never intended to be a grant-giving organization.

Then why did they exist? what are you saying this "staff" did? In plain English.

[Tahuyaman]

Nice try.


Like yourself, who started this thread with a bogus citation that was full of lies, the post you are defending attempted to tie a totally separate set of issues that have nothing to do with Joe Biden, to the cancer initiative. In fact, the paragraphs that directly follow the one paragraph that was used in the post, refute the premise of the claim that was being made.

When I cite a source, I post a paragraph or two in order to make the point, and include a link. I fully expect people to use the link, although many here rely solely on headlines for their information.

That's hardly the same as doing what you did. Claiming that Biden took fully 60% of all monies raised by the charity for his political supporters. Or what Keepers did. Purposely redacting the bulk of article that paints a totally different picture than the one he was trying to make in support of your bogus premise.

Only an idiot would supply a link that proves them a liar. But, I find that Conservatives rarely check facts. They just run here to post random lies that were pitched on Fox News.

That is freaking crazy.

[Tahuyaman]

Yep, Everyone knew it was just income for them and payment for political favors.

Chelsea used foundation money for a wedding for goodness sake.

Liberals are held to a lower standard. After all, their intentions are what’s important, not their actions.

[Tahuyaman]

Over 65% went to stuff their pockets....

Some of it paid for perks, but mostly salaries to the top brass.