President received written briefing about Bounties

[TheLiquidGuy]

What do you mean how so? By seeking and only accepting information from sources which they always agree with.

Substantiate your rock-dumb claim.

[Tahuyaman]

Substantiate your rock-dumb claim.

You'd refute it rationally and substantively, but you can't. You don't have the ability to do so.

[TheLiquidGuy]

Ah, the epitome of projection.

I am 100% serious. I am not trying to insult you.

You sound like a you are mindlessly parroting pre programmed talking points and key words like "hoax" as a knee jerk reaction to anything that contains the trigger word "Russia". Are you a bot? Did you even read the comment? Or did you just scan it for pavlovian stimuli? Can you summarize the point of my post? Or are you here just to automatically demonstrate dissent to anything that criticizes the leader?


Let me summarize: Your response made no sense unless this was an accident and you had meant to respond to some other post.

[TheLiquidGuy]

You'd refute it rationally and substantively, but you can't. You don't have the ability to do so.

Sorry but that's not how it works. You made the claim. You have to substantiate it.

You also have the option of retracting your claim. But something tells me you are not man enough to do the right thing.

[Ransom]

Anything solid from the liquid guy yet?

No?

Reckon I'll move on.

[Tahuyaman]

Sorry but that's not how it works. You made the claim. You have to substantiate it.

You also have the option of retracting your claim. But something tells me you are not man enough to do the right thing.

Don't tell me how it works. You don't have the credibility to tell me how it works.

Either refute my comment with something resembling substance or move on.

[Tahuyaman]

I am 100% serious. I am not trying to insult you.

You sound like a you are mindlessly parroting pre programmed talking points and key words like "hoax" as a knee jerk reaction to anything that contains the trigger word "Russia". Are you a bot? Did you even read the comment? Or did you just scan it for pavlovian stimuli? Can you summarize the point of my post? Or are you here just to automatically demonstrate dissent to anything that criticizes the leader?


Let me summarize: Your response made no sense unless this was an accident and you had meant to respond to some other post.

Am I the only one who detects a bucket load of irony here?

[TheLiquidGuy]

Don't tell me how it works. You don't have the credibility to tell me how it works.

Either refute my comment with something resembling substance or move on.

Everyone here knows how it works.

Everyone here (even you) knows that a person who makes a claim bears the burden of proving that claim.

Go ahead. Prove it.

Last chance.

Prove it or retract it.

Either option allows you to retain your already minimal credibility.

Anything else drops it to zero.

[TheLiquidGuy]

Am I the only one who detects a bucket load of irony here?

probably

[Standing Wolf]

Hey, I'm not going to read through this longass thread to find out, but am I the first to suggest that when someone told Trump about "bounties", he just thought they were talking about paper towels?