User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 13 FirstFirst ... 3910111213
Results 121 to 125 of 125

Thread: Is Durham going to manipulate the election by NOT waiting?

  1. #121
    Points: 247,989, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteranOverdriveSocial
    Awards:
    Activity Award
    Tahuyaman's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    276419
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Bremerton, Washington
    Posts
    110,057
    Points
    247,989
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    13,425
    Thanked 45,409x in 33,626 Posts
    Mentioned
    485 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Another forum to share an opinion.

  2. #122
    Points: 78,608, Level: 68
    Level completed: 38%, Points required for next Level: 1,442
    Overall activity: 33.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    hanger4's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    214333
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Mountains of WNC
    Posts
    29,914
    Points
    78,608
    Level
    68
    Thanks Given
    12,963
    Thanked 15,442x in 10,428 Posts
    Mentioned
    474 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post
    The feds took over the investigation. And then they sat on it for months without doing anything. When they closed the investigation they tried to do it without anyone noticing by saying it in a footnote of a court filing. But that didnít work. As soon as they closed that allowed the state to resume investigation. But by then they had lost a lot of time.


    You are in luck. I was not gonna do anything to prove it to you, but last night I happened to see Rachel Maddow talk about it on her show a bit. Since its no effort to paste a link, Iíll post it below. Again this just happened to air last night.


    Start listening around 4:30. It goes about 4 minutes. (Or do yourself a favour and listen to the whole show some time)

    There is no written policy, just an unspoken understanding. Holder spoke of it, Lynch spoke of it, Comey ignored it, Barr spoke of it. During the Obama administration there was talk of codifying it, but determined to be unenforceable.

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-60-day-rule

    *Investigations Into 2020 Candidates Must Be Cleared by Top Justice Dept. Officials

    The move is intended to help avoid upending the election as the F.B.I. inadvertently did in 2016 when its campaign inquiries shaped the outcome of the race.*

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...tions.amp.html

    Don't know why it was so hard to find. Here's some other sources;

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/double-...mobilewebshare

    https://www.npr.org/2020/02/06/80350...investigations

  3. #123
    Points: 20,301, Level: 34
    Level completed: 60%, Points required for next Level: 449
    Overall activity: 41.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered10000 Experience Points
    carolina73's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    5391
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    7,970
    Points
    20,301
    Level
    34
    Thanks Given
    4,812
    Thanked 5,383x in 3,707 Posts
    Mentioned
    31 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The information is not about Biden and not against Trump. This is not the same as 2016. This is mostly about people that are already sitting at liberal nes sources making more money than they did as government. The left always rewards those that do their dirty work.

  4. #124
    Points: 14,454, Level: 29
    Level completed: 1%, Points required for next Level: 996
    Overall activity: 45.0%
    Achievements:
    3 months registered10000 Experience Points
    TheLiquidGuy's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    321
    Join Date
    Nov 2019
    Posts
    3,191
    Points
    14,454
    Level
    29
    Thanks Given
    258
    Thanked 311x in 254 Posts
    Mentioned
    47 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hanger4 View Post
    There is no written policy, just an unspoken understanding. Holder spoke of it, Lynch spoke of it, Comey ignored it, Barr spoke of it. During the Obama administration there was talk of codifying it, but determined to be unenforceable.

    https://www.lawfareblog.com/about-60-day-rule

    *Investigations Into 2020 Candidates Must Be Cleared by Top Justice Dept. Officials

    The move is intended to help avoid upending the election as the F.B.I. inadvertently did in 2016 when its campaign inquiries shaped the outcome of the race.*

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...tions.amp.html

    Don't know why it was so hard to find. Here's some other sources;

    https://www.wsj.com/articles/double-...mobilewebshare

    https://www.npr.org/2020/02/06/80350...investigations
    The 60-day/90-day rule is a thing. I read that article too. I posted about it just today here: http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...51#post2942551 Lots of people talk about the rule. Making it a thing. But as I point out in that post, even if it were not a thing, Barr changed that. In fact, he made sure that it was a 10-month long thing instead of a 60/90 day long thing. And he made sure that all would have to go through him. Does that seem a little excessive to you? 10 months? Do you find it coincidental that he did so in the middle of other brewing investigations in NY into felony fraud by the president? Do you find it weird that he doesn't mind letting the Durham thing go through? I have been asking myself what ever happened to a whistleblower report of mishandling of the presidents tax audit? what happened to an allegation of misappropriation and self dealing during the Trump inaugural celebrations? What happened to the state department IG who was fired for looking into Pompeo? I feel like I am forgetting at least a couple of other things that disappeared as the president flooded us with too many things to keep track of. But I wonder how these things disappear after Barr makes this new 10 month rule, that was clearly intended to benefit a president under intense scrutiny.
    TRUMP LIE COUNTER: 20,055 (since entering office)

    The Republican-led Senate intel committee concluded: Russia wants Trump elected.

    Listen to opposing media. When a Democrat gets elected, listen to Sean Hannity. For now, listen to Rachel Maddow.
    9 of the top 10 most corrupt states are Republican See link 1 See link 2
    1



  5. #125
    Points: 81,045, Level: 69
    Level completed: 42%, Points required for next Level: 1,405
    Overall activity: 38.0%
    Achievements:
    Tagger First ClassSocial50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    stjames1_53's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    44641
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    29,884
    Points
    81,045
    Level
    69
    Thanks Given
    54,479
    Thanked 15,659x in 11,310 Posts
    Mentioned
    106 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by TheLiquidGuy View Post
    The 60-day/90-day rule is a thing. I read that article too. I posted about it just today here: http://thepoliticalforums.com/thread...51#post2942551 Lots of people talk about the rule. Making it a thing. But as I point out in that post, even if it were not a thing, Barr changed that. In fact, he made sure that it was a 10-month long thing instead of a 60/90 day long thing. And he made sure that all would have to go through him. Does that seem a little excessive to you? 10 months? Do you find it coincidental that he did so in the middle of other brewing investigations in NY into felony fraud by the president? Do you find it weird that he doesn't mind letting the Durham thing go through? I have been asking myself what ever happened to a whistleblower report of mishandling of the presidents tax audit? what happened to an allegation of misappropriation and self dealing during the Trump inaugural celebrations? What happened to the state department IG who was fired for looking into Pompeo? I feel like I am forgetting at least a couple of other things that disappeared as the president flooded us with too many things to keep track of. But I wonder how these things disappear after Barr makes this new 10 month rule, that was clearly intended to benefit a president under intense scrutiny.
    For the past (almost) 4 years, you have done everything that you can dirty towards Trump. You have conspired to commit treason, lie cheat and steal. You thrown a few people in jail because they wouldn't help unseat Trump.
    Now you're complaining that Durham is doing something dirty?
    Feel that warm stuff on your back? That was a conservative throwing up on you......
    For waltky: http://quakes.globalincidentmap.com/
    "The Nation that makes a great distinction between its scholars and its warriors will have its thinking done by cowards and its fighting done by fools."
    - Thucydides

    "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote" B. Franklin
    Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to stjames1_53 For This Useful Post:

    Peter1469 (08-08-2020)

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Single Sign On provided by vBSSO