User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: Taliban tells fighters group is ‘on the threshold’ of ‘pure Islamic government’

  1. #31
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497547
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,557x in 94,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    Do something else. Prevent the Taliban from building their version of a nation.
    NOPD

    Not our problem dude
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  2. #32
    Points: 141,954, Level: 90
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 1,096
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48096
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,331
    Points
    141,954
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,173
    Thanked 15,103x in 10,785 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    NOPD

    Not our problem dude
    I do remember the last time that was used. Ended up being very much our problem, indeed, following the attacks in Paris no one opposed direct, overt military confrontation with ISIS by forces of these United States. No one.

    NOPD was used until Sept 11, 2001 in Afghanistan. NOPD was used concerning the Syrian civil conflict. NOPD was used while the Islamic State rolled over the Levant in pickup trucks. NOPD was used during the Iran/Iraq war until oil tankers had to be reflagged. NOPD could and should not be used concerning attacks on Israel, South Korea, Yemen, Afghanistan, Taiwan, or Guam. NOPD doesn't work. Has never worked. Will never work.

  3. #33
    Points: 54,857, Level: 57
    Level completed: 22%, Points required for next Level: 1,493
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    PJL's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    992
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    10,860
    Points
    54,857
    Level
    57
    Thanks Given
    103
    Thanked 982x in 846 Posts
    Mentioned
    232 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    I do remember the last time that was used. Ended up being very much our problem, indeed, following the attacks in Paris no one opposed direct, overt military confrontation with ISIS by forces of these United States. No one.

    NOPD was used until Sept 11, 2001 in Afghanistan. NOPD was used concerning the Syrian civil conflict. NOPD was used while the Islamic State rolled over the Levant in pickup trucks. NOPD was used during the Iran/Iraq war until oil tankers had to be reflagged. NOPD could and should not be used concerning attacks on Israel, South Korea, Yemen, Afghanistan, Taiwan, or Guam. NOPD doesn't work. Has never worked. Will never work.
    More of your fantasy based nonsense.....(lol)

  4. #34
    Points: 141,954, Level: 90
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 1,096
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48096
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,331
    Points
    141,954
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,173
    Thanked 15,103x in 10,785 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PJL View Post
    More of your fantasy based nonsense.....(lol)
    It's what happened actually. ISIS the most recent reminder how and why it suddenly becomes our business.

  5. #35
    Points: 56,731, Level: 58
    Level completed: 20%, Points required for next Level: 1,619
    Overall activity: 0.3%
    Achievements:
    SocialVeteran50000 Experience Points
    bulletbob's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    4648
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Location
    florida
    Posts
    12,372
    Points
    56,731
    Level
    58
    Thanks Given
    13,999
    Thanked 4,639x in 3,469 Posts
    Mentioned
    56 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by PJL View Post
    More of your fantasy based nonsense.....(lol)
    look who is talking lol your telling others fantasy based nonsense lol thats rich really , talk about the pot calling the kettle black

  6. #36
    Original Ranter
    Points: 863,827, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.9%
    Achievements:
    SocialCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Peter1469's Avatar Advisor
    Karma
    497547
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    NOVA
    Posts
    242,878
    Points
    863,827
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    153,702
    Thanked 148,557x in 94,977 Posts
    Mentioned
    2554 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    No.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ransom View Post
    I do remember the last time that was used. Ended up being very much our problem, indeed, following the attacks in Paris no one opposed direct, overt military confrontation with ISIS by forces of these United States. No one.

    NOPD was used until Sept 11, 2001 in Afghanistan. NOPD was used concerning the Syrian civil conflict. NOPD was used while the Islamic State rolled over the Levant in pickup trucks. NOPD was used during the Iran/Iraq war until oil tankers had to be reflagged. NOPD could and should not be used concerning attacks on Israel, South Korea, Yemen, Afghanistan, Taiwan, or Guam. NOPD doesn't work. Has never worked. Will never work.
    The US can decide to not micromanage Afghan government and still remain safe.
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ


  7. #37
    Points: 141,954, Level: 90
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 1,096
    Overall activity: 25.0%
    Achievements:
    50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Ransom's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    48096
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    44,331
    Points
    141,954
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    10,173
    Thanked 15,103x in 10,785 Posts
    Mentioned
    496 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    No.

    The US can decide to not micromanage Afghan government and still remain safe.
    Indeed. But prevention of a Taliban government hardly micromanagement.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts