A Forumeer Says that Hitler was Far Right

[TheOneOnly2]

you fail to go to the very beginning. WWI was caused by Ferdinand's assassination.
Do you think that if it weren't for that event, WWI would have never happened? YOU might disagree with the TOS, but you weren't there for the trench warfare campaign via mustard gas. It was this egregious action that hit the German's so hard. A price must be exacted and reducing that nation's rise to such power was supposed to be hampered. Well, that didn't work because it didn't matter about the amount of restitution because they still managed to rebuild bigger and more dangerous.

A am not a nazi and you are not triggering me with your nonsense. If you want to know what I think then ask me.

Like I said - kill them all.

Anyway this is off topic.

[TheOneOnly2]

Then you stand alone in anthropological history and remember the intent of the German side of the equation. That is precisely what the Germans, as a nation, set out to do.

Pretty much.

[Captdon]

This idiotic thread needs to just die

Then go away.

[Tahuyaman]

Then go away.

If wanted your view I'd scrape it off my shoe.

[Captdon]

Do you mind if I ask how they were capitalistic? What leads you to believe this.

They allowed capitalism to flourish unheeded by any concern to the workers. They also gave the common man free or reduced rent, free healthcare and a guaranteed job. Nazism was a blend of capitalism and socialism but he emphasis was on socialism. He needed the capitalists for the money.

[Captdon]

Two reasons

#1 Hitler would have been the only Right Wing Mass murderer in modern History. Though if you go back in time you can find many. But when you understand that the left wants Socialism, and their belief that although it has always failed with the exception of very small mineral rich countries, they just can't stand the thought of knowing that in a large economy it takes the murder of Millions of people to get the ideals they believe in to be the law of the land.

#2 They must blame this on the right and erase the past, as they are planning on using it again to attain their agenda

This is an emotional response.

[Captdon]

What do you think should be done with nations declaring a world war when they lose? There are massive damages they caused and the loss of lives trying to get them under control.
But I guess none of that matters to a real Nazi..........

Some truth to that. The problem was the allies wanted too much. They wanted what no nation could have paid. They made Germany susceptible to almost anything.

[Captdon]

I dont know what you mean and I am not a real nazi. But - the best idea is to kill everyone.

Oh - you are saying that Treaty of Versailles was justified. Well how did it work out? The result was another world war in no time. Would have been better off invading Germany - murdering every last one of them and taking their land. You could argue that invading and occupying Germany and Japan to control them has worked out well for USA but like Trump says - Germany is belligerent. Germany only exists because USA allowed/allows it to so who are they? Who is Germany to argue with USA on any point? Who is Germany to attack US companies like google? Who are Germany or all of Europe for that matter to compete with US companies? Who is Japan to compete with USA? USA won the war so why do these nations still exist? Why

Who the %$%$ are the Europeans to support Palestine over Israel? To constantly go against USA and attack Israel through UN? Europe should not exist - it should be USA. Japan should be USA. There should not be European or Japanese people. Europe and Japan should never cause any problem ever again because they lost - they should not exist anymore. Same goes for all these complaining 'first peoples' - you leave survivors and happens? Problems. I would argue the same for domestic problems - victor of civil war should just kill everybody and take the land - that way there are no problems in the future. Women, children - every last one of them. I would go so far as to say kill their animals so that nobody can ever say that this animal was owned by such and such. Just like what the Jews did to the Amalek. When was the last time an Amalek caused problems for a Jew?




edit - The 'engineer' should have stomped on Davids head after he tore it off right? Ha.

This off-topic. It's incomprehensible.

[Captdon]

Kaiser Wilhelm declared war with the assassination of Arch Duke Ferdinand. There is a price to be paid when you do something like that.
If I'm reading you correctly, Germany started a war, but should have never suffered the consequences. So, you justify Hitler conducting a global war campaign because he didn't like the Terms of Surrender............again, no consequences.
I'm sure the WWII vets agree with you...oh, and those 65 million Jews will agree as well

Suffered was to be expected. What happened was a disgrace. The terms were unbearable and collapsed the German economy. There has to be something happen. That was Hitler. Did the allies make the right choice?

WWII was related to WWI only in the belief that the politicians surrendered but not the army. In a way that was true. The Army would have surrendered soon for lack of supplies. (That's were the belief we won the war for the allies). It was an excuse for the Nazis and the Communists.

[Captdon]

you fail to go to the very beginning. WWI was caused by Ferdinand's assassination.
Do you think that if it weren't for that event, WWI would have never happened? YOU might disagree with the TOS, but you weren't there for the trench warfare campaign via mustard gas. It was this egregious action that hit the German's so hard. A price must be exacted and reducing that nation's rise to such power was supposed to be hampered. Well, that didn't work because it didn't matter about the amount of restitution because they still managed to rebuild bigger and more dangerous.

The restitution was impossible to pay. Never corner a rat.