Gundlach, Who Correctly Called The 2016 Presidential Election, Predicts Trump Will Wi

[Peter1469]

Gundlach, Who Correctly Called The 2016 Presidential Election, Predicts Trump Will Win Again

He also doesn't think Harris was a good pick for Joe's handlers.

Back in early, DoubleLine's Jeff Gundlach made a prediction that was viewed as anathema in "serious" circles: he said that Donald Trump would win the 2016 presidential election. And much to the chagrin of all his "serious" colleagues, he was proven correct which is why earlier today we said that the one thing we were most curious about from Gundlach's latest webcast was who he thinks would win this time around.

Well, we got the answer, and once again if Gundlach is correct a whole lot of "experts" (not to mention pollsters) will again be humiliated on Nov 4, because according to the bond king Trump will once again emerge victorious.


One would not know it based on such online betting sites as PredictIt (which incidentally are remarkably illiquid, and extremely easy to manipulate by anyone with modestly deep pockets), which show Biden as a clear favorite with a roughly 15 point lead...


So it makes sense to ignore the pollsters, the online bookies and the exports who were dead wrong in 2016, and focus on those who called it right.


With that in mind, during a Q&A on his Tuesday afternoon webcast, Gundlach said that "my base case is actually that Donald Trump will win re-election," adding that he'd "bet against" former Vice President Joe Biden defeating Trump in November.


"I think polls are very, very squishy right now because of the highly toxic political environment in which we live," the 60-year-old billionaire said. Gundlach said he’s come across data suggesting that about "two-thirds of conservatives or moderate conservatives say that they have lied about their support for Donald Trump either directly or by omission."


"I just think there's a lot, a lot of time here. There's going to be twists and turns," Gundlach added.

[Mister D]

I don't know why they would pick Harris. My guess is they thought she might energize the single female vote. She's a dud for the black vote. It might even depress it.

[Peter1469]

I don't know why they would pick Harris. My guess is they thought she might energize the single female vote. She's a dud for the black vote. It might even depress it.

I was surprised at the choice. Blacks are not fans of hers.

[carolina73]

The biased polls are tightening. We know they will continue to tighten as we reach the election because that is when the lies of the leftists will get exposed by the actual vote.

[Mister D]

I was surprised at the choice. Blacks are not fans of hers.

I had a suspicion and a hope it would be her. It's really an establishment decision but I just don't understand the strategy. Or is there one? Do they think it's already in the bag and her obvious shortcomings won't matter?

[Peter1469]

I had a suspicion and a hope it would be her. It's really an establishment decision but I just don't understand the strategy. Or is there one? Do they think it's already in the bag and her obvious shortcomings won't matter?

I posted in the Conspiracy forum a while back that just as in 2016 the Establishment wants Trump to win- that is why they are putting their very weak candidates forward. Why? Because the coming economic crash needs to occur on the Repub watch. That will allow the Dems to usher in the globalist agenda for the US.

They had planned on the crash occurring by now. Since it hasn't they are throwing the race.

[Tahuyaman]

Gundlach, Who Correctly Called The 2016 Presidential Election, Predicts Trump Will Wi

With the recent selection of Harris as Biden's running mate, Trump's chances of reelection increased substantially.

[mamooth]

Harris is extremely popular. Trump cultists, don't fall for your own conspiracy theories. That never turns out well. If you do, Biden's landslide and his coattails will get even bigger. You may give the Democrats 60 senate seats.


Yesterday's ipsos/reuters poll, Biden +11. +16 if undecideds have to decide. And that's before the inevitable Harris bump.


https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/...08_12_2020.pdf

[The Xl]

Harris is extremely popular. Trump cultists, don't fall for your own conspiracy theories. That never turns out well. If you do, Biden's landslide and his coattails will get even bigger. You may give the Democrats 60 senate seats.


Yesterday's ipsos/reuters poll, Biden +11. +16 if undecideds have to decide. And that's before the inevitable Harris bump.


https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/...08_12_2020.pdf

Harris is so popular that her campaign got absolutely destroyed when Tulsi Gabbard, who was polling under 1%, attacked her record, lmao. She's a disaster.

[Captdon]

Harris is extremely popular. Trump cultists, don't fall for your own conspiracy theories. That never turns out well. If you do, Biden's landslide and his coattails will get even bigger. You may give the Democrats 60 senate seats.


Yesterday's ipsos/reuters poll, Biden +11. +16 if undecideds have to decide. And that's before the inevitable Harris bump.


https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/...08_12_2020.pdf

Harris was so popular she dropped out before a single primary happened.