And once again, like inductive, you have used an alternative meaning as opposed to the common meaning. An Ad Hom attack - in general terms of netiquitte - means attacking the man, not the argument. Once again, you have to be more forthright and transparent. I'm not a mindreader.
Of course gravity is an absolute. When it stops being gravity, it no longer meets the definition. And Archimedes? Are you saying there have been instances in science where objects have been put in water and the amount of displaced water DOESN'T match that of the object? Links please. This ought to be good.
What you have done, which is almost laughable, is take what the common norm is (ie, scientists too scared to draw a line in the sand so they always give themselves an out but saying 'no science is aboslute), and run with it, when there is example after example of scientific experiments that are absolute. I think this parlays with your desire to fit in with religion. "Oh look, they are criticising religion for only being faith based, when even their precious science is too because, as everybody knows, there are no absolutes in science!!". To which I say - in case you haven't noticed - Hogwash!....
I know, that's what i said.An Ad Hom attack - in general terms of netiquitte - means attacking the man, not the argument.
Tell us all something we don't know, happy.
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi
In quoting my post, you affirm and agree that you have not been goaded, provoked, emotionally manipulated or otherwise coerced into responding.
"The difference between what we do and what we are capable of doing would suffice to solve most of the world’s problems.”
Mahatma Gandhi