User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: NTSB Recommends Full ban on Cell Phones/Mobile Devices for Driving....

  1. #1
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    NTSB Recommends Full ban on Cell Phones/Mobile Devices for Driving....

    A federal safety board called Tuesday for a nationwide ban on the use of cell phones and text messaging devices while driving.

    Tuesday's recommendation, if adopted by states, would outlaw non-emergency phone calls and texting by operators of every vehicle on the road.....snip~

    http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-13/u...river?_s=PM:US


    Good idea or not? To much Big/Fed Govt? Citing Distractions and safety. Using the rationale that Security should be the way to go.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  2. #2
    Points: 8,894, Level: 22
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 356
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    cindy's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    24
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    39
    Points
    8,894
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 14x in 12 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I think it's good. It's not big government, it's just being safe. They say talking on the phone makes you as bad a driver as if you had been drinking so I agree with it.

  3. #3
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Morning Cindy.....do you think that should also include hands free devices? Do you think the states will really adopt this ban? Truckers have CB's Radio's. Cabbies, Police, and Firefiighters all the same. Can't exclude them.
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

  4. #4
    Points: 8,894, Level: 22
    Level completed: 56%, Points required for next Level: 356
    Overall activity: 0.0%
    Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    cindy's Avatar Junior Member
    Karma
    24
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    39
    Points
    8,894
    Level
    22
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 14x in 12 Posts
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good morning MCC

    So many questions! Yes I think it should be for all phones even speakerphones. CB radio is different and the people you mentioned have a lot more experience plus they are not on them all the time. Also I would never take it away from police or fire. They need them to do their job.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to cindy For This Useful Post:

    MMC (12-16-2011)

  6. #5
    Original Ranter
    Points: 112,719, Level: 81
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 931
    Overall activity: 0.1%
    Achievements:
    SocialTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first GroupVeteran
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7413
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,473
    Points
    112,719
    Level
    81
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,511x in 2,019 Posts
    Mentioned
    238 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    What do you think MMC? I'm against hand held, not sure how I feel about hands free.

  7. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 388,252, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 0.2%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassOverdriveTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    MMC's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    70170
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Posts
    89,892
    Points
    388,252
    Level
    100
    Thanks Given
    54,131
    Thanked 39,167x in 27,728 Posts
    Mentioned
    243 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would be against hands free. Some cars have that ability. But I would note the NTSB also doesnt want people to eat when in the car. They talk about distractions and have even brought banning radios and stereos. Now to me that is telling people that they need to intervene due to them thinking for others. This would include Navigational devices as well. But do we really need Big Government telling us and deciding for us? I think the states should go with the texting but that they should decide. Not the Fed!

    Moreover if they use the arguement that only professionals should be allowed to do so. Then there are many who could be classified as such as thats what they do and would be considered more of a professional than either a cop or a firefighter. As they are on the road more and in more severe conditions.

    Seems to me on another front that the Fed wants to limit that social networking.....huh?
    History does not long Entrust the care of Freedom, to the Weak or Timid!!!!! Dwight D. Eisenhower ~

+ Reply to Thread

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts