BEIRUT (Reuters) - World powers argued about the details of a U.N. resolution on Syria, after suicide car bombers lent a grim new face to its conflict by killing 44 in Damascus.
European and U.S. officials want the Security Council to impose an arms embargo and other sanctions on Syria's government because of its nine-month-old crackdown on protesters, which U.N. officials say has killed thousands.

Western powers say government security forces have been responsible for most of the violence. But Russia, an old ally of Damascus, wants any resolution to be even-handed.
"If the requirement is that we drop all reference to violence coming from extreme opposition, that's not going to happen," U.N. ambassador Vitaly Churkin said in New York after Russia submitted a revised draft resolution to the council.
"If they expect us to have arms embargo, that's not going to happen," he said. "We know what arms embargo means these days. It means that - we saw it in Libya - that you cannot supply weapons to the government but everybody else can supply weapons to various opposition groups."

The first batch of 50 Arab League monitors will head to Syria on Monday to assess whether Damascus is abiding by an Arab peace plan, Egypt's state news agency reported on Friday.....snip~

http://news.yahoo.com/attacks-launch...091436551.html <<<<< More Here!
Reuters – 7 hrs ago.

Looks Like Russia is adamant on any Arms Embargo or any interference by Western powers in Syria. Are they just puffing out their chest especially after their creation of the Satan Missile?

Does anyone think Assads forces are leaving cars with bombs in them all over the place just to make it look like the Sunni and the MB are guilty of it. We do know there is an opposition force being led by former Military that had defected from Assad's Forces. Most know the Muslim Brotherhood have been involved with the Sunni in Syria. Also we know these rebels have been meeting and training in Turkey.

Some Western Powers think the Arab League should be the one to handle what is taking place with this conflict. The King of Saudi Arabia has become pretty vocal over this. Other Sunni Leaders harp on what the Saud state out their mouths. Yet the Saudi.....don't want to take on Assads Forces. First they are not capable of doing anything militarily against Assad. Basically because they know the Syrians will fight back. Second they know they would would get their azzes kicked. So to me this a mute point in that the Sunni will want Western Powers to intervene once again. The Sunni cannot handle anything on their own.

I would note that now in Iraq since we have left. There have quite a few bombing taking place. With the majority of these events being instigated by the Sunni against the Shia led government ruling Iraq. Well.....albeit one part. As don't forget the Kurds have their own President in Iraq ruling over the Northern part. In which the Sunni VP ran to the Kurds for Protection while remaining inside Iraq. Course the Shia are unrestrained from retailiating in this country. Not like Yemen and Bahrian.....huh?