Bible Discussions.....

[MMC]

Sigh...

1. this person is not "most military historians".
2. It's an anecdote from some guy's blog.
3. LOL

I'm not sure what you're trying to prove wrong.

Look D.....it's real simple. She has been in touch with the Top Military Historians at West Point, Annapolis, and Canada/Britian and Israel. Her reserach took in with Brenner. Religious Historians both from the US and Israel. Thats most in the field of Military Intellegence. Research and validation of Saul's Timeline and whom he was round. Then his time as Paul.

Laughing about it doesnt change the facts that the Theory exists and is out there. Also why would such shake Christianity to the core? If found to be true, that is.

So what I used a blog to prove that the theory was out there. There are other links and they have shown it on Televison. You cannot dispute her credentials nor whom she has had to be communicating with and work with concerning the research. In order to get it out there. All that basic bull$#@! and generalities that all take place with research. One cannot attempt to change what was originally thought as truth. Without facts.

[Mister D]

Look D.....it's real simple. She has been in touch with the Top Military Historians at West Point, Annapolis, and Canada/Britian and Israel. Her reserach took in with Brenner. Religious Historians both from the US and Israel. Thats most in the field of Military Intellegence. Research and validation of Saul's Timeline and whom he was round. Then his time as Paul.

Laughing about it doesnt change the facts that the Theory exists and is out there. Also why would such shake Christianity to the core? If found to be true, that is.

So what I used a blog to prove that the theory was out there. There are other links and they have shown it on Televison. You cannot dispute her credentials nor whom she has had to be communicating with and work with concerning the research. In order to get it out there. All that basic bull$#@! and generalities that all take place with research. One cannot attempt to change what was originally thought as truth. Without facts.

She can be in touch with millions of people. It doesn't matter. Let me repeat:

1. this person is not "most military historians".
2. It's an anecdote from some guy's blog.
3. LOL

And I'll add a 4th

4. Few religious scholars and/or historians subscribe to this theory.

I don't care if the theory is "out there". Many dubious theories are out there. So what?

[MMC]

She can be in touch with millions of people. It doesn't matter. Let me repeat:

1. this person is not "most military historians".
2. It's an anecdote from some guy's blog.
3. LOL

And I'll add a 4th

4. Few religious scholars and/or historians subscribe to this theory.

I don't care if the theory is "out there". Many dubious theories are out there. So what?

I said Military.....and I didnt say they all agreed. I said she had to be in commuication with them for her research. But the majority of Military historians are agreeing. Which is why the research went forward. If there was nothing there, it would have been shot down from the get go.

Who cares if it comes from some blog....if that is such a problem for you go directly to the Virginia Institute. Or to Sheldons own Site. Then you can discover for yourself. Moreover she doesnt need to go to many. Just the top in their respective fields and all those that agree with them.

So what.....what do you mean so what, again you cannot dispute her credentials at all! Nor whom she has been in contact with which involves her work. Despite your beliefs and or feelings.

[Mister D]

I said Military.....and I didnt say they all agreed. I said she had to be in commuication with them for her research. But the majority of Military historians are agreeing. Which is why the research went forward. If there was nothing there, it would have been shot down from the get go.

Who cares if it comes from some blog....if that is such a problem for you go directly to the Virginia Institute. Or to Sheldons own Site. Then you can discover for yourself. Moreover she doesnt need to go to many. Just the top in their respective fields and all those that agree with them.

So what.....what do you mean so what, again you cannot dispute her credentials at all! Nor whom she has been in contact with which involves her work. Despite your beliefs and or feelings.

She is one person and all you are going on as far as she is concerned is the claim some guy made on his blog. Secondly, no, few historians subscribe to this theory. Very few. Third, what would military historians know about whether or not Paul was a genuine convert? Fourth, it was an MA thesis. Do you really think people are going to say it's crap?

For the record, few historians (in any field of history) subscribe to this theory.

[MMC]

I would have thought ya might have stuck up for one of ya own D....

New Jersey State Scholarship 1965-1969.

[Mister D]

I would have thought ya might have stuck up for one of ya own D....

New Jersey State Scholarship 1965-1969.

I don't even know if what is claimed on this blog is true and I don't care where she is from.

[MMC]

No D. I am going by her book and the TV show and her credentials. I give two $#@!s about some guys blog other than he knew about it. Plus All Whom she has been incontact with overseas and over what her Expertise is!

EDITORIAL BOARDS:

• The Journal of Military History
• International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence
• Small Wars and Insurgencies 2004-
• Sparta

PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS:

• Classical Association of Virginia
• Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies
• Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies
• Association of Ancient Historians
• Association of Former Intelligence Officers
• International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, Editorial Board
• Small Wars and Insurgencies, Editorial Board
• RIEAS (Research Institute for European and American Studies, Athens, Greece), Advisory Board.

RADIO APPEARANCES:

• NPR, With Good Reason, 2001, "Espionage in the Ancient World"
• NPR, With Good Reason, March 15-21, 2003 "The Problem of Evil
• NPR, With Good Reason, May 2006, "Rome's Wars in Iraq With Modern Parallels"

ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATIONS:

• University of Michigan Excavations at Carthage, Tunisia
• Università di Perugia Excavations at Saepinum, Italy
• Université de Grenoble Excavations at Marnans, France
• Archaeological Survey of Constantine, Algeria

EDUCATION:

• Ph.D. 1987 The University of Michigan, Ancient history, Roman provincial archaeology, Byzantine history
• M.A. 1976 Hunter College, City University of New York, Ancient history, Medieval history
• B.A. 1969 Trenton State College, Trenton, New Jersey, European history

[Mister D]

You are going by some guy's blog. Do you have any information on her opinions regarding this theory? No. You have an anecdote on a blog.

[MMC]

You are going by some guy's blog. Do you have any information on her opinions regarding this theory? No. You have an anecdote on a blog.

Didnt CL put up one of her quotes from her book?

[Mister D]

Didnt CL put up one of her quotes from her book?

No. Spies of the Bible is her book and it does not mention this theory.