User Tag List

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Economics is Fun, Part 9: Joint Enterprise

  1. #1
    Points: 149,056, Level: 92
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 1,194
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    21772
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    45,410
    Points
    149,056
    Level
    92
    Thanks Given
    3,082
    Thanked 7,766x in 6,140 Posts
    Mentioned
    366 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    265

    Economics is Fun, Part 9: Joint Enterprise



    Might get some argument on this one.

  2. #2
    Original Ranter
    Points: 83,174, Level: 70
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,676
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first Group
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7385
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,475
    Points
    83,174
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,491x in 2,002 Posts
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    98
    Haha, Bush and entrepreneur...they're still bashing him over there?

    All of thee videos are thoroughly convincing that the free market is the best path to follow. The problem results when government intervenes on behalf of those who fund their campaigns.

  3. #3
    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 141,931, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,119
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    32138
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    32,147
    Points
    141,931
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    11,965
    Thanked 8,460x in 6,383 Posts
    Mentioned
    579 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    356
    Great video. I would like to see him expand on limited liability in the future.

  4. #4
    Points: 149,056, Level: 92
    Level completed: 67%, Points required for next Level: 1,194
    Overall activity: 100.0%
    Achievements:
    SocialRecommendation Second ClassYour first GroupOverdrive1 year registered50000 Experience PointsTagger First Class
    Awards:
    Frequent Poster
    Chris's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    21772
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Posts
    45,410
    Points
    149,056
    Level
    92
    Thanks Given
    3,082
    Thanked 7,766x in 6,140 Posts
    Mentioned
    366 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    265
    That's the part I think might be controversial. I'd earlier understood limited liability as no risk, or virtually none. But the limit is your investment, no risk losing more. I can see how that encourages investment, but also encourages possibly more risk that without it.

  5. #5
    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 141,931, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,119
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    32138
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    32,147
    Points
    141,931
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    11,965
    Thanked 8,460x in 6,383 Posts
    Mentioned
    579 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris View Post
    That's the part I think might be controversial. I'd earlier understood limited liability as no risk, or virtually none. But the limit is your investment, no risk losing more. I can see how that encourages investment, but also encourages possibly more risk that without it.
    That is referring to the stock owners. If I buy 100 shares in XYZ corp, and it goes out of business and even commits fraud, the max that I can lose is my 100 shares (or whatever it grew to over the years.)

    Then there is a separate issue of the corporate board. They are the ones driving the train of the corporation, and they have a different sort of limited liability. Often many are guaranteed millions even if they fail.

  6. #6
    Original Ranter
    Points: 83,174, Level: 70
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,676
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first Group
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7385
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,475
    Points
    83,174
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,491x in 2,002 Posts
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    98
    I think it encourages risk when you are using others investments, no doubt. If you are risking your own money (but not all of your assets) then you likely take less of a risk.

  7. #7
    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 141,931, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,119
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    32138
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    32,147
    Points
    141,931
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    11,965
    Thanked 8,460x in 6,383 Posts
    Mentioned
    579 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    356
    I like the limited liability idea for stock holders for the reasons stated in the video. It is that other type of limited liability for the leadership that takes large corporations out of the free market arena.

  8. #8
    Original Ranter
    Points: 83,174, Level: 70
    Level completed: 31%, Points required for next Level: 1,676
    Overall activity: 7.0%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredTagger Second Class50000 Experience PointsYour first Group
    Conley's Avatar Senior Member
    Karma
    7385
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    22,475
    Points
    83,174
    Level
    70
    Thanks Given
    4,582
    Thanked 2,491x in 2,002 Posts
    Mentioned
    224 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Peter1469 View Post
    That is referring to the stock owners. If I buy 100 shares in XYZ corp, and it goes out of business and even commits fraud, the max that I can lose is my 100 shares (or whatever it grew to over the years.)

    Then there is a separate issue of the corporate board. They are the ones driving the train of the corporation, and they have a different sort of limited liability. Often many are guaranteed millions even if they fail.
    Exactly. Whatever assets the company has are sold off and the creditors are paid off in a certain order. Often there is no money left for the common shareholders at the end of the process.

  9. #9
    tPF Moderator
    Original Ranter
    V.I.P
    Points: 141,931, Level: 90
    Level completed: 69%, Points required for next Level: 1,119
    Overall activity: 99.6%
    Achievements:
    Social1 year registeredCreated Album picturesOverdrive50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Discussion Ender
    Peter1469's Avatar Moderator Representative
    Karma
    32138
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    32,147
    Points
    141,931
    Level
    90
    Thanks Given
    11,965
    Thanked 8,460x in 6,383 Posts
    Mentioned
    579 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    356
    Quote Originally Posted by Conley View Post
    Exactly. Whatever assets the company has are sold off and the creditors are paid off in a certain order. Often there is no money left for the common shareholders at the end of the process.
    I believe that shareholders have a secured claim, so they are above unsecured claims. I could be wrong. I know that bond holders have a secured claim- unless you are talking about GM!.....

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts


Linksgrower Forum Topsite Critical Acclaim
Top Ron Paul Sites - Ranking the best Ron Paul related Freedom and Liberty Websites
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO